The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ScanNet: An interpretable geometric deep learning model for structure-based protein binding site prediction
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41592-022-01490-7 · Paper page
Abstract
Predicting the functional sites of a protein from its structure, such as the binding sites of small molecules, other proteins or antibodies sheds light on its function in vivo. Currently, two classes of methods prevail: Machine Learning (ML) models built on top of handcrafted features and comparative modeling. They are respectively limited by the expressivity of the handcrafted features and the availability of similar proteins. Here, we introduce ScanNet, an end-to-end, interpretable geometric deep learning model that learns features directly from 3D structures. ScanNet builds representations of atoms and amino acids based on the spatio-chemical arrangement of their neighbors. We train ScanNet for detecting protein-protein and protein-antibody binding sites, demonstrate its accuracy - including for unseen protein folds - and interpret the filters learned. Finally, we predict epitopes of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, validating known antigenic regions and predicting previously uncharacterized ones. Overall, ScanNet is a versatile, powerful, and interpretable model suitable for functional site prediction tasks. A webserver for ScanNet is available from http://bioinfo3d.cs.tau.ac.il/ScanNet/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Metadata
- Authors
- Tubiana, J., Schneidman-Duhovny, D., & Wolfson, H.
- Affiliations
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- Corresponding author
- Tubiana, Jérôme
- Wolfson, Haim
- Venue
- Nature Methods
- Publisher
- Research Square Platform LLC
- Published
- 2021-09-21
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 730-739
- ISSN
- 1548-7091 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4229031603
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 70 · 2025: 75 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 48 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Methods (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Blavatnik Family Foundation
- Human Frontier Science Program (LT001058/2019-C)
- Hebrew University of Jerusalem
- Israel Science Foundation (ISF 1466/18, 1466/18)
- Tel Aviv University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- protein binding site prediction, geometric deep learning, model interpretability, protein structure, protein-protein binding, epitope prediction, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Binding Sites, Humans, Protein Binding, Proteins, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review