Degrees Of Relatedness: The Social Politics Of Algonquian Kinship In The Contact Era Chesapeake
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Complex kinship structures hidden behind English depictions of Powhatan society also helped frame colonial Chesapeake history.
“Complex kinship structures that are masked behind English depictions of Powhatan society also played a role in framing colonial Chesapeake history (Woodard 2008).”
From The Archaeology of Native Societies in the Chesapeake: New Investigations and Interpretations (2011) · cites this paper as Woodard 2008
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Archaeology of Native Societies in the Chesapeake: New Investigations and Interpretations
Gallivan, M. (2011) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-010-9048-4 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Woodard, B.
- Corresponding author
- Woodard, Buck
- ORCID
- Woodard, Buck
- Venue
- College of William and Mary - Arts and Sciences
- Publisher
- College of William and Mary - Arts and Sciences
- Published
- 2008
- OpenAlex
- W3157073294
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- W&M Publish (College of William & Mary) (submittedVersion)
- William & Mary School of Arts & Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Colonialism, slavery, and trade
- Keywords
- social politics, Native American-European contact, kinship terms, colonial Virginia, Native American social organization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
