Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 8,311

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory

Open access
Wuetherick, Brad·2010·Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education

Abstract

An updated and revised edition of Corbin and Strauss’ popular handbook on grounded theory, Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd edition), remains a classic in qualitative research. This third edition, one of the most readable and practical explorations of grounded theory available, is a must-read for any graduate student or researcher interested in using grounded theory for qualitative research. Corbin and Strauss have laid out their volume in a manner that easily walks any beginning (or experienced) researcher through the grounded theory approach to data collection, analysis, and reflection. The combination of both writing about the process and demonstrating it with actual research study examples works very well for reinforcing how to “make sense out of masses of qualitative data” using grounded theory (pp. ix-x). A classic, it should remain on the shelves of researchers for years to come. What Corbin and Strauss’ revised edition is not, however, is a guide to the basics of all qualitative research. It is important to realize when reading this book that there are both subtle and explicit differences between various qualitative research methods. The strength of this book is that it stays focused on exploring a grounded theory approach to qualitative research and does not try to incorporate other qualitative methodologies into the text. Contrary to its title, however, the Basics of Qualitative Research does not delve deeply into other commonly used qualitative methodologies. The author(s) acknowledge this issue when they state: I am not an expert in other methods . . . each method has its own theoretical foundation, purpose and procedures for collecting and analyzing data. Quality quantitative research can be done using all of the different methods as long as the user is true to the method. (p. 326)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21225/d5g01t

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 8,311

Metadata

Authors
Wuetherick, B.
Venue
Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education
Published
2010-01-02
Volume
36
Issue
2
ISSN
0318-9090 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1615506555
Cited by
8,311
References
0
FWCI
412.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21225/d5g01t
The paper
Wuetherick, B. (2010). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education. https://doi.org/10.21225/d5g01t

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.