The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Textured Image Segmentation
Abstract
Abstract : The problem of image texture analysis is introduced, and existing approaches are surveyed. An empirical evaluation method is applied to two texture measurement systems, co-occurrence statistics and augmented correlation statistics. A spatial-statistical class of texture measures is then defined and evaluated. It leads to a simple class of texture energy transforms, which perform better than any of the preceding methods. These transforms are very fast, and can be made invariant to changes in luminance, contrast, and rotation without histogram equalization or other preprocessing. Texture energy is measured by filtering with small masks, typically 5x5, then with a moving-window average of the absolute image values. This method, similar to human visual processing, is appropriate for textures with short coherence length or correlation distance. The filter masks are integer-valued and separable, and can be implemented with one-dimensional or 3x3 convolutions. The averaging operation is also very fast, with computing time independent of window size. Texture energy planes may be linearly combined to form a smaller number of discriminant planes. These principal component planes seem to represent natural texture dimensions, and to be more reliable texture measures than the texture energy planes. Texture segmentation or classification may be accomplished using either texture energy or principal component planes as input. This study classified 15x15 blocks of eight natural textures. Accuracies of 72% were achieved with co- occurrence statistics, 65% with augmented correlation statistics, and 94% with texture energy statistics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions
Ojala, T., Pietikäinen, M., & Harwood, D. (1996) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/0031-3203(95)00067-4 · Cited by 6,882
Yilmaz, A., Javed, O., & Shah, M. (2006) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1177352.1177355 · Cited by 4,792
Unsupervised texture segmentation using Gabor filters
Jain, A. K., & Farrokhnia, F. (1991) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/0031-3203(91)90143-s · Cited by 2,182
Multichannel texture analysis using localized spatial filters
Bovik, A. C., Clark, M., & Geisler, W. S. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.41384 · Cited by 1,382
Exploiting Visual Artifacts to Expose Deepfakes and Face Manipulations
Matern, F., Riess, C., & Stamminger, M. (2019) · 2019 IEEE Winter Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw.2019.00020 · Cited by 824
Metadata
- Authors
- Laws, K. I.
- Publisher
- Defense Technical Information Center
- Published
- 1980-01-01
- OpenAlex
- W145358992
- Cited by
- 851
- References
- 0
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Textured Image Segmentation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21236/ada083283
- The paper
- Laws, K. I. (1980). Textured Image Segmentation. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada083283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.