Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 600

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Static Analysis of Executables to Detect Malicious Patterns

Christodorescu, Mihai, Jha, Somesh·2006

Abstract

Abstract Malicious code detection is a crucial component of any defense mechanism. In this paper, we present a uniqueviewpoint on malicious code detection. We regard malicious code detection as an obfuscation-deobfuscation game between malicious code writers and researchers working on malicious code detection. Malicious code writers attemptto obfuscate the malicious code to subvert the malicious code detectors, such as anti-virus software. We tested the resilience of three commercial virus scanners against code obfuscation attacks. The results were surprising: the threecommercial virus scanners could be subverted by very simple obfuscation transformations! We present an architecture for detecting malicious patterns in executables that is resilient to common obfuscation transformations. Experimentalresults demonstrate the efficacy of our prototype tool, SAFE (a static analyzer for executables). 1 Introduction In the interconnected world of computers, malicious code has become an omnipresent and dangerous threat. Maliciouscode can infiltrate hosts using a variety of methods such as attacks against known software flaws, hidden functionality in regular programs, and social engineering. Given the devastating effect malicious code has on our cyber infrastruc-ture, identifying malicious programs is an important goal. Detecting the presence of malicious code on a given host is a crucial component of any defense mechanism. Malicious code is usually classified [28] according to its propagation method and goal into the following categories:*

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21236/ada449067

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 600

Metadata

Authors
Christodorescu, M., & Jha, S.
Published
2006-01-01
OpenAlex
W1544837488
Cited by
600
References
31
Type
report
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Static Analysis of Executables to Detect Malicious Patterns. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21236/ada449067
The paper
Christodorescu, M., & Jha, S. (2006). Static Analysis of Executables to Detect Malicious Patterns. https://doi.org/10.21236/ada449067

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.