Cited by 14

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Dutch Perspective on Coastal Louisiana Flood Risk Reduction and Landscape Stabilization

Dijkman, Jos·2007

Abstract

After the disaster that hurricane Katrina caused along the Gulf coast and in particular in New Orleans (August-September, 2006), many in the United States looked at how the Netherlands protects itself against extreme flood events. Flood protection levels in the Netherlands, by international comparison, are very high but nevertheless affordable. Would the strategy followed by the Dutch not be the example that should be used when considering the long-term flood risk management in Louisiana? And given the rapid loss of wetlands in the Mississippi Delta, could Louisiana benefit from the recent change in policy in the Netherlands, in which preference is shifted from only relying on traditional approaches involving levees and flood barriers towards building with nature in combination with traditional approaches? The current planning activities in the framework of the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration project (LACPR) aim to develop alternative strategies for long-term flood risk management options as well as for restoration of the rapidly deteriorating Mississippi Delta. In common language: LACPR focuses on both flood protection for Category 5 hurricanes and coastal restoration. Since Katrina, the existing co-operation between the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Netherlands Rijkswaterstaat (under the Netherlands Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management) has intensified and shifted its primary focus on shared flood management issues. In the frame…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21236/ada473780

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Metadata

Authors
Dijkman, J.
Published
2007-10-18
Cited by
14
References
0

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review