The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Dutch Perspective on Coastal Louisiana Flood Risk Reduction and Landscape Stabilization
Abstract
After the disaster that hurricane Katrina caused along the Gulf coast and in particular in New Orleans (August-September, 2006), many in the United States looked at how the Netherlands protects itself against extreme flood events. Flood protection levels in the Netherlands, by international comparison, are very high but nevertheless affordable. Would the strategy followed by the Dutch not be the example that should be used when considering the long-term flood risk management in Louisiana? And given the rapid loss of wetlands in the Mississippi Delta, could Louisiana benefit from the recent change in policy in the Netherlands, in which preference is shifted from only relying on traditional approaches involving levees and flood barriers towards building with nature in combination with traditional approaches? The current planning activities in the framework of the Louisiana Coastal Protection and Restoration project (LACPR) aim to develop alternative strategies for long-term flood risk management options as well as for restoration of the rapidly deteriorating Mississippi Delta. In common language: LACPR focuses on both flood protection for Category 5 hurricanes and coastal restoration. Since Katrina, the existing co-operation between the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the Netherlands Rijkswaterstaat (under the Netherlands Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management) has intensified and shifted its primary focus on shared flood management issues. In the frame…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For many nations and flood management organizations the 2005 flooding of New Orleans served as the proverbial wake-up call (Dijkman 2007).”
From Towards integrated flood management along the lower Rhine and Mississippi Rivers and the international legacy of the 2005 New Orleans Hurricanes Katrina–Rita flood disaster (2018) · cites this paper as Dijkman 2007
In the citing paper
“The 2005 New Orleans flooding by Hurricanes Katrina-Rita have taken on epic proportions and stimulated important changes to the vision and practice of flood management.”
From Towards integrated flood management along the lower Rhine and Mississippi Rivers and the international legacy of the 2005 New Orleans Hurricanes Katrina–Rita flood disaster (2018) · cites this paper as Dijkman 2007
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hudson, P. F. (2018) · International Journal of River Basin Management · doi:10.1080/15715124.2017.1411921 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Dijkman, J.
- Publisher
- Defense Technical Information Center
- Published
- 2007-10-18
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review