The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reporting of Objective Color Measurements
Open accessAbstract
The analysis of color is frequently an important consideration when determining the efficacy of a variety of postharvest treatments.Consumers can easily be influenced by preconceived ideas of how a particular fruit or vegetable should appear, and marketers often attempt to improve upon what nature has painted.In spite of the significance of color in our work, however, many researchers continue to analyze this characteristic inappropriately.The confusion that results is unnecessary; easily computed and readily understood measures are available to clarify color descriptions for researchers and marketers alike.Specifically, many scientists in the field of market quality, who are using instruments such as the Hunter colorimeter (Hunter Assoc., Reston, Va.) and various Minolta chroma meters (Minolta, Ramsey, N.J.), analyze and publish a set of Cartesian coordinates generated directly by the instrument.These coordinates pinpoint the measured color in a three-dimensional color space.However, without further manipulation, this information does not provide an indication of hue and chroma-aspects of color that are intuitively understood by those in the marketing chain from producer to consumer.These aspects of color are addressed directly in the color chart-based Munsell notation that specifies the elements of perceived color as value (lightness, from black to white on a scale of 0 to 10), chroma (degree of departure from gray toward pure chromatic color), and hue (red, orange, yellow, green, etc.).In contrast, the instrumentally obtained coordinates, CIE 1931 (Y, x, y) or CIE 1976 (L*, a*, b*), provide information on lightness directly but require some computation to yield explicit measures of chroma and hue (Hunter and Harold, 1987).CIE refers to the Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (International Commission on Illumination).In the CIE 1976 (L*, a*, b*) color space, abbreviated CIELAB, the lightness coefficient, L*, ranges from black = 0 to white
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Edible Coatings for Fresh-Cut Fruits
Olivas, G. I., & Barbosa-Cánovas, G. V. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition · doi:10.1080/10408690490911837 · Cited by 406
Quality changes and nutrient retention in fresh-cut versus whole fruits during storage
Gil, M. I., Aguayo, E., & Kader, A. A. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf060303y · Cited by 376
The effect of apple pomace on the texture, rheology and microstructure of set type yogurt
Wang, X., Kristo, E., & LaPointe, G. (2019) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.01.004 · Cited by 257
Fanasca, S., Colla, G., Maiani, G., Venneria, E., Rouphael, Y., Azzini, E., & Saccardo, F. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf0602572 · Cited by 189
Spinardi, A., Cola, G., Gardana, C. S., & Mignani, I. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.01045 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- McGuire, R. G.
- Venue
- HortScience
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1254-1255
- ISSN
- 0018-5345 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9834
- OpenAlex
- W1847310508
- Cited by
- 2,946
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reporting of Objective Color Measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21273/hortsci.27.12.1254
- The paper
- McGuire, R. G. (1992). Reporting of Objective Color Measurements. HortScience. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.27.12.1254
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.