Cited by 6Flowering Plant Growth and CultivationPlant Growth and Agriculture TechniquesPlant Growth Enhancement Techniques

Chemical Regulators Affect Growth, Postproduction Performance, and Propagation of Golden Pothos

Open access
Wang, Yin-Tung, Gregg, Lori L.·1994·HortScience

Abstract

Drench paclobutrazol or uniconazole applications (0.1-1.0 mg/0.5-liter pot or 0.05-0.2 mg/pot, respectively) were effective in suppressing stem elongation of golden pothos [Epipremnum aureum (Linden & Andrè) Bunt.]. Although the leaf production rate was reduced by both retardants, treated plants produced larger leaves than the controls, resulting in greater total leaf areas. Response to foliar paclobutrazol or uniconazole applications (0-200 and 0-100 mg·liter -1 , respectively) was similar to the soil drench patterns, except that the leaf production rate was unaffected. Following 10 weeks in an interior environment, plants previously treated with either retardant produced shorter stems, fewer but larger leaves, and lower fresh weights than the nontreated plants. Cuttings collected from stock plants previously treated with a paclobutrazol or uniconazole soil drench (0.1 or 0.05 mg/0.5-liter pot, respectively) produced longer stemmed shoots, more and larger leaves, and heavier shoot fresh weights than cuttings from the nontreated plants. Foliar paclobutrazol application (0-200 mg·liter -1 ) to stock plants resulted in cuttings producing larger leaves and heavier shoot fresh weights than controls. Chemical names used: (2RS,3RS)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,-4-dlmethyl-2-(l,2,4-trizol-l-yl)pentin-3-ol (paclobutrazol);(E)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,-4-timethyl-2-(1,2,4-trizol-l-yl)l-penten-3-ol (uniconazole).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21273/hortsci.29.3.183

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 4 · Cited by 6

Authors
Wang, Y.-T., & Gregg, L. L.
Affiliations
Texas A&M University (US)
Venue
HortScience
Published
1994-03
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
183-185
ISSN
  • 0018-5345 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-9834
OpenAlex
W2189105112
Cited by
6
References
4
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
HortScience (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques
Keywords
Epipremnum aureum, plant growth retardants, paclobutrazol, uniconazole, stem elongation, leaf production rate, leaf area, cuttings, propagation, foliar application, soil drench

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review