The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Physical Properties of Various Coconut Coir Dusts Compared to Peat
Open accessAbstract
Selected physical properties of 13 coconut coir dusts from Asia, America, and Africa were compared to physical properties of sphagnum peat. All properties studied differed significantly between and within sources, and from the peat. Coir dusts from India, Sri Lanka, and Thailand were composed mainly of pithy tissue, whereas most of those from Costa Rica, Ivory Coast, and Mexico contained abundant fiber which was reflected by a higher coarseness index (percentage by weight of particles larger than 1 mm in diameter). Coir dust was evaluated as a lightweight material, and its total porosity was above 94% (by volume). It also exhibited a high air content (from 24% to 89% by volume) but a low easily available and total water-holding capacity which ranged from <1% to 36% by volume and from 137 to 786 mL·L –1 , respectively. Physical properties of coir dust were strongly dependent on particle size distribution. Both easily available and total water-holding capacity declined proportionally with increasing coarseness index, while air content was positively correlated. Relative hydraulic conductivity in the range of 0 to 10 kPa suction dropped as particle size increased. Coir dusts with a particle size distribution similar to peat showed comparatively higher aeration and lower capacity to hold total and easily available water. An air–water balance similar to that in peat became apparent in coir dust at a comparatively lower coarseness index (29% vs. 63% by weight in peat). Stepwise multiple regression analysis showed that particles with diameters in the range of 0.125 to 1 mm had a remarkable and highly significant impact on the physical properties studied, while particles <0.125 mm and >1 mm had only a slight or nonsignificant effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Closed‐form Equation for Predicting the Hydraulic Conductivity of Unsaturated Soils
van Genuchten, M. T. (1980) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · Cited by 27,578
A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media
Mualem, Y. (1976) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr012i003p00513 · Cited by 8,300
Cited by
Barrett, G. E., Alexander, P. D., Robinson, J. S., & Bragg, N. C. (2016) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2016.09.030 · Cited by 528
Tirpak, R. A., Afrooz, A. N., Winston, R. J., Valenca, R., Schiff, K., & Mohanty, S. K. (2021) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2020.116648 · Cited by 201
Development of nutrient-rich growing media with hazelnut husk and municipal sewage sludge
Dede, O. H., & Ozdemir, S. (2018) · Environmental Technology · doi:10.1080/09593330.2017.1352038 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Abad, M., Fornes, F., Carrión, C., Noguera, V., Noguera, P., Maquieira, A., & Puchades, R.
- Venue
- HortScience
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2138-2144
- ISSN
- 0018-5345 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9834
- OpenAlex
- W2340042263
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physical Properties of Various Coconut Coir Dusts Compared to Peat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2138
- The paper
- Abad, M., Fornes, F., Carrión, C., Noguera, V., Noguera, P., Maquieira, A., & Puchades, R. (2005). Physical Properties of Various Coconut Coir Dusts Compared to Peat. HortScience. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2138
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.