Dry matter content and stability of carotenoids in kale and spinach during drying
Open accessAbstract
Drying of spinach ( Spinacia oleracea L.) and kale ( Brassica oleracea L. var. acephala D.C.) is required to determine percentage of dry matter (%DM) and pigment concentration of fresh leaves. ‘Melody’ spinach and ‘Winterbor’ kale were greenhouse-grown in hydroponic nutrient solutions containing 13 or 105 mg·L −1 N. Using vacuum freeze dryers and convection ovens, plant tissues were dried for 120 h at five different temperature treatments: 1) freeze drying at −25 °C; 2) freeze drying at 0 °C; 3) vacuum drying at +25 °C; 4) oven drying at +50 °C; and 5) oven drying at +75 °C. Spinach leaf tissue %DM was affected, but kale %DM was unaffected by drying temperature. Spinach and kale leaf tissue %DM were both affected by N level. The high N spinach decreased from 7.3 to 6.4%DM when drying temperature increased from +25 to +75 °C. The low N spinach decreased from 12.7 to 9.6%DM as the drying temperature increased from −25 to +50 °C. Kale averaged from 14.8%DM for the high N treatment and from 21.8%DM for the low N treatment. However, drying temperature did not have a significant impact on measured %DM in kale. Lutein, β-carotene, and chlorophyll levels for both spinach and kale leaf tissue were affected by drying temperature. Measured concentrations of all pigments decreased over 70% as the drying temperature increased from −25 to 75 °C. The largest pigment fresh and dry weight concentrations for spinach and kale were measured at drying temperatures below +25 °C. The spinach and kale samples dried between −25 and +25 °C were not significantly different from each other in %DM or pigment concentration measured on a dry or fresh weight basis. Thus, drying leaf tissue for accurate pigment analysis requires temperatures below +25 °C using vacuum or freeze drying technology.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lesfrud et al., Kolton et al. and Ouzounis et al. declared that chlorophyll, lutein and β-carotene are mainly influenced by light.
“Lesfrud et al. [53], Kolton et al. [54] and Ouzounis et al. [55] declared that chlorophyll, lutein and β-carotene are mainly influenced by light.”
From Mars Regolith Simulant Ameliorated by Compost as in situ Cultivation Substrate Improves Lettuce Growth and Nutritional Aspects (2020) · cites this paper as [53]
The results on kale pigment accumulation report effects of nitrogen treatment and drying temperature on lutein, β-carotene, and chlorophyll; they do not compare those effects with light. A title in the References mentions a separate irradiance study, but our copy does not state that these pigments are mainly influenced by light (searched for light and irradiance). (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Ames, B.N., L.S. Gold, and W.C. Willett. 1995. The cause and prevention of cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:5258-5265. ASABE. 2007. Moisture measurement-Forages. American Society of Agricultural and Biolog- ical Engineers, Standard S358.2. ASABE, St.
- Davies, B.H. and H.P. Köst. 1988. Chromatographic methods for the separation of carotenoids, p. 1- 185. In: Köst, H.P., G. Zweig, and J. Sherma (eds.). CRC handbook of chromatography, plant pigments. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
- Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: A biometrical ap- proach. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Duri, L. G., El-Nakhel, C., Caporale, A. G., Ciriello, M., Graziani, G., Pannico, A., Palladino, M., Ritieni, A., De Pascale, S., Vingiani, S., et al. (2020) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants9050628 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lefsrud, M., Kopsell, D., Sams, C., Wills, J., & Both, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lefsrud, Mark
- Venue
- HortScience
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1731-1736
- ISSN
- 0018-5345 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9834
- OpenAlex
- W2126779826
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- HortScience (publishedVersion)
- Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Drying and Modeling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Keywords
- kale, spinach, carotenoids, lutein, beta-carotene, chlorophyll, drying temperature, dry matter content, freeze-drying, vacuum drying, oven drying, nitrogen fertilization, pigment stability, leaf tissue
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review