The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Plant Productivity in Response to LED Lighting
Open accessAbstract
Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) have tremendous potential as supplemental or sole-source lighting systems for crop production both on and off earth. Their small size, durability, long operating lifetime, wavelength specificity, relatively cool emitting surfaces, and linear photon output with electrical input current make these solid-state light sources ideal for use in plant lighting designs. Because the output waveband of LEDs (single color, nonphosphor-coated) is much narrower than that of traditional sources of electric lighting used for plant growth, one challenge in designing an optimum plant lighting system is to determine wavelengths essential for specific crops. Work at NASA's Kennedy Space Center has focused on the proportion of blue light required for normal plant growth as well as the optimum wavelength of red and the red/far-red ratio. The addition of green wavelengths for improved plant growth as well as for visual monitoring of plant status has been addressed. Like with other light sources, spectral quality of LEDs can have dramatic effects on crop anatomy and morphology as well as nutrient uptake and pathogen development. Work at Purdue University has focused on geometry of light delivery to improve energy use efficiency of a crop lighting system. Additionally, foliar intumescence developing in the absence of ultraviolet light or other less understood stimuli could become a serious limitation for some crops lighted solely by narrow-band LEDs. Ways to prevent this condition are being investigated. Potential LED benefits to the controlled environment agriculture industry are numerous and more work needs to be done to position horticulture at the forefront of this promising technology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Green-light supplementation for enhanced lettuce growth under red- and blue-light-emitting diodes
Kim, H.-H., Goins, G. D., Wheeler, R. M., & Sager, J. C. (2004) · HortScience · doi:10.21273/hortsci.39.7.1617 · Cited by 527
Self-citation
Cited by
Hogewoning, S. W., Trouwborst, G., Maljaars, H., Poorter, H., van Ieperen, W., & Harbinson, J. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq132 · Cited by 957
Lin, K.-H., Huang, M.-Y., Huang, W.-D., Hsu, M.-H., Yang, Z.-W., & Yang, C.-M. (2013) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2012.10.002 · Cited by 740
Don’t ignore the green light: exploring diverse roles in plant processes
Smith, H. L., McAusland, L., & Murchie, E. H. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erx098 · Cited by 359
Park, Y., & Runkle, E. S. (2017) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.12.013 · Cited by 292
Bantis, F., Ouzounis, T., & Radoglou, K. (2016) · Scientia Horticulturae · doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2015.11.014 · Cited by 209
Metadata
- Authors
- Massa, G. D., Kim, H.-H., Wheeler, R. M., & Mitchell, C. A.
- Venue
- HortScience
- Published
- 2008-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1951-1956
- ISSN
- 0018-5345 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9834
- OpenAlex
- W2282404210
- Cited by
- 784
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plant Productivity in Response to LED Lighting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21273/hortsci.43.7.1951
- The paper
- Massa, G. D., Kim, H.-H., Wheeler, R. M., & Mitchell, C. A. (2008). Plant Productivity in Response to LED Lighting. HortScience. https://doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.43.7.1951
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.