Responses of Sweet Basil to Different Daily Light Integrals in Photosynthesis, Morphology, Yield, and Nutritional Quality
Open accessAbstract
Consumption of basil ( Ocimum basilicum ) has been increasing worldwide in recent years because of its unique aromatic flavor and relatively high concentration of phenolics. To achieve a stable and reliable supply of basil, more growers are turning to indoor controlled-environment production with artificial lighting due to its high environmental controllability and sustainability. However, electricity cost for lighting is a major limiting factor to the commercial application of indoor vertical farming, and little information is available on the minimum light requirement to produce uniform and high-quality sweet basil. To determine the optimal daily light integral (DLI) for sweet basil production in indoor vertical farming, this study investigated the effects of five DLIs, namely, 9.3, 11.5, 12.9, 16.5, and 17.8 mol·m −2 ·d −1 on basil growth and quality. ‘Improved Genovese Compact’ sweet basil was treated with five DLIs provided by white fluorescent lamps (FLs) for 21 d after germination, and gas exchange rate, growth, yield, and nutritional quality of basil plants were measured to evaluate the effects of the different DLIs on basil growth and quality. Results indicated that basil plants grown under higher DLIs of 12.9, 16.5, or 17.8 mol·m −2 ·d −1 had higher net photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance ( g S ), compared with those under lower DLIs of 9.3 and 11.5 mol·m −2 ·d −1 . High DLIs resulted in lower chlorophyll (Chl) a+b concentration per leaf fresh weight (FW), higher Chl a/b ratios, and larger and thicker leaves of basil plants. The shoot FW under DLIs of 12.9, 16.5, and 17.8 mol·m −2 ·d −1 was 54.2%, 78.6%, and 77.9%, respectively, higher than that at a DLI of 9.3 mol·m −2 ·d −1 . In addition, higher DLIs led to higher soluble sugar percent and dry matter percent than lower DLIs. The amounts of total anthocyanin, phenolics, and flavonoids per plant of sweet basil were also positively correlated to DLIs, and antioxidant capacity at a DLI of 17.8 mol·m −2 ·d −1 was 73% higher than that at a DLI of 9.3 mol·m −2 ·d −1 . Combining the results of growth, yield, and nutritional quality of sweet basil, we suggest a DLI of 12.9 mol·m −2 ·d −1 for sweet basil commercial production in indoor vertical farming to minimize the energy cost while maintaining a high yield and nutritional quality.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dou et al. recommend 14 mol/m2/day for a 16-hour photoperiod as the optimal daily light integral (DLI) for sweet basil.
“Dou et al. (2018) [39] recommend 14 mol/m 2 /day for a 16-hour photoperiod as the optimal daily light integral (DLI) for sweet basil [40].”
From Indoor Vertical Farming in the Urban Nexus Context: Business Growth and Resource Savings (2020) · cites this paper as [39]
The Conclusions recommend 12.9 mol/m²/day for commercial sweet basil production in indoor vertical farming, not 14 mol/m²/day. Materials and Methods confirm that the treatments used a 16-hour photoperiod. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Albright, L., A.J. Both, and A. Chiu. 2000. Con- trolling greenhouse light to a consistent daily integral. Trans. Amer. Soc. Agr. Eng. 43:421- 431.
- Bian, Z.H., Q.C. Yang, and W.K. Liu. 2015. Effects of light quality on the accumulation of phytochemicals in vegetables produced in con- trolled environments: A review. J. Sci. Food Agr. 95:869-877.
- Bochenek, G.M. and I. Fallstrom. 2016. The effect of diurnal light intensity distribution on plant productivity in a controlled environment. In: C.J. Currey, R.G. Lopez, and E.S. Runkle (eds.). Proc. VIII Intl. Symp. Light Hort. 1134:155-162.
- Hatier, J.H.B., M.J. Clearwater, and K.S. Gould. 2013. The functional significance of black- pigmented leaves: Photosynthesis, photoprotec- tion and productivity in Ophiopogon planiscapus 'Nigrescens'. PLoS One 8(6):e67850.
- Kozai, T. 2013. Resource use efficiency of closed plant production system with artificial light: Concept, estimation and application to plant factory. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 89:447.
- Kozai, T., G. Niu, and M. Takagaki. 2015. Plant factory: An indoor vertical farming system for efficient quality food production. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
- Nitz, G.M. and W.H. Schnitzler. 2004. Effect of PAR and UV-B radiation on the quality and quantity of the essential oil in sweet basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). In: D.J. Cantliffe, P.J. Stoffella, and N.L. Shaw (eds.). Proc. VII Intl. Symp. Protected Cult. Mild Winter Climates: Prod. Pest Mgt. Global Comp. 1:375-381.
- Polyakova, M., T.M. Yu, T. Dilovarova, and A. Kosobryukhov. 2015. Photosynthesis and pro- ductivity of basil plants (Ocimum basilicum L.) under different irradiation. Agr. Biol. 50 (1):124-130.
- Pushpangadan, P. and V. George. 2012. Basil, p. 55-72. In: K.V. Peter (ed.). Handbook of herbs and spices. Elsevier, Atlanta, GA.
- Solovchenko, A. 2010. Localization of screening pigments within plant cells and tissues, p. 67- 88. In: Photoprotection in plants. Springer, New York, NY.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indoor Vertical Farming in the Urban Nexus Context: Business Growth and Resource Savings
Avgoustaki, D. D., & Xydis, G. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12051965 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
“(2018) [39] recommend 14 mol/m2/day for a 16-hour photoperiod as the optimal daily light integral (DLI) for sweet basil [40].”
Background
- Authors
- Dou, H., Niu, G., Gu, M., & Masabni, J. G.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Texas A&M University System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Niu, Genhua
- Venue
- HortScience
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 496-503
- ISSN
- 0018-5345 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9834
- OpenAlex
- W2801916096
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 11.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- HortScience (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture (TEX090450)
- National Institute of Food and Agriculture
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Light effects on plants
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Growth and nutrition in plants
- Keywords
- Ocimum basilicum, daily light integral, indoor vertical farming, artificial lighting, net photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content, anthocyanins, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, antioxidant capacity, soluble sugars, plant morphology, biomass yield, nutritional value, gas exchange rate, transpiration
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review