Cited by 69Physical Activity and HealthOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Can older gardeners meet the physical activity recommendation through gardening?

Open access
Park, Sin-Ae, Shoemaker, Candice, Haub, Mark·2008·HortTechnology

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate if older gardeners meet the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and American College of Sports Medicine physical activity (PA) recommendation of at least 30 minutes of moderate intensity PA on most days of the week through gardening. The heart rate of 14 gardeners (five women, nine men) aged 63 to 86 years was continuously measured through radiotelemetry, during gardening. Oxygen uptake and energy expenditure were measured through indirect calorimetry using a submaximal graded exercise test in a laboratory. To determine how long the subjects gardened and the kinds of gardening tasks performed, an observational study was conducted by two trained observers, and weekly logs were completed by the subjects. To investigate the subjects physical and mental health conditions, the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) was used. Gardening was determined to be moderate intensity (3.8 ± 1.4 metabolic equivalents) PA. The subjects' average gardening time during the observational study was 53 minutes. The subjects reported gardening an average of 33 hours in a typical week in May and almost 15 hours in a typical week in June and July. Results from the SF-36 indicated that the subjects were physically and mentally healthy. In conclusion, healthy older gardeners can meet the PA recommendation from their daily gardening and it may be a factor leading to good physical and mental health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.21273/horttech.18.4.639

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the US, elderly people who participated in daily gardening could achieve recommended physical activity levels (at least 30 min of moderate intensity physical activity on most, preferably all, days).

    “Notably, in the US, Park et al. (2008) pointed out that if elderly people participated in daily gardening, they could achieve recommended physical activity levels (at least 30 min of moderate intensity physical activity on most, preferably all, days).”

    From Gardening is beneficial for health: A meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Park et al. (2008)

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21 · Cited by 69

Authors
Park, S.-A., Shoemaker, C., & Haub, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Horticulture, Forestry, and Recreation Resources
  • Center on Aging
Venue
HortTechnology
Published
2008-01
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
639-643
ISSN
  • 1063-0198 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7714
OpenAlex
W2104128228
Cited by
69
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
HortTechnology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
gardening, older adults, physical activity, physical activity guidelines, moderate-intensity exercise, metabolic equivalents, heart rate, oxygen consumption, energy expenditure, physical health, mental health, quality of life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review