The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Chemical Composition of Lowbush Blueberry Cultivars
Open accessAbstract
The chemical composition of the lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium Aiton) cultivars Blomidon, Cumberland, and Fundy were examined at three stages of fruit maturity, before and after refrigerated storage, in a 2-year study. There were differences (P< 0.001) related to maturity and cultivar in berry fresh weight, percentage dry matter, fruit firmness, percentage soluble solids, titratable acidity, and the concentration of sugar, acids, and anthocyanins. Among the nine organic and phenolic acids measured, seven acids varied among the maturity groups and eight varied among the cultivars. Between the 2 years of study there was a 60% difference in total fruit acid content as well as in the relative amounts of each acid. The 2-year mean profile of lowbush blueberry acids was distinctly different from that recently reported for highbush (Vaccinium corymbosum L.) and rabbiteye blueberries (Vaccinium ashei Reade). The level of certain acids as well as the concentration of anthocyanins increased during cold storage. Estimation of sugar concentration by percentage soluble solids overestimated sugar concentration by 3070. Acid measurement by titration underestimated acid content as measured by HPLC by 61%. Results of this study illustrate the variation in the chemical composition of lowbush blueberry fruit among cultivars, maturities, and seasons, and can be used to compare lowbush blueberries with other Vaccinium species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Phenolics in Food and Nutraceuticals
Shahidi, F., & Naczk, M. (2003) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9780203508732 · Cited by 1,496
Prior, R. L., Cao, G., Martin, A., Sofic, E., McEwen, J., O'Brien, C., Lischner, N., Ehlenfeldt, M., Kalt, W., Krewer, G., et al. (1998) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf980145d · Cited by 1,295
Self-citationPhenolic compounds and related enzymes as determinants of quality in fruits and vegetables
Tomás‐Barberán, F. A., & Espín, J. C. (2001) · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture · doi:10.1002/jsfa.885 · Cited by 1,288
Antioxidant Capacity, Vitamin C, Phenolics, and Anthocyanins after Fresh Storage of Small Fruits
Kalt, W., Forney, C. F., Martin, A., & Prior, R. L. (1999) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf990266t · Cited by 980
Self-citationRecent Research on the Health Benefits of Blueberries and Their Anthocyanins
Kalt, W., Cassidy, A., Howard, L. R., Krikorian, R., Stull, A. J., Tremblay, F., & Zamora-Ros, R. (2020) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.1093/advances/nmz065 · Cited by 659
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalt, W., & McDonald, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 142-146
- ISSN
- 0003-1062 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9788
- OpenAlex
- W2105080193
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chemical Composition of Lowbush Blueberry Cultivars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21273/jashs.121.1.142
- The paper
- Kalt, W., & McDonald, J. E. (1996). Chemical Composition of Lowbush Blueberry Cultivars. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.121.1.142
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.