The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Efficiency of Volatile Formaldehyde Removal by Indoor Plants: Contribution of Aerial Plant Parts versus the Root Zone
Open accessAbstract
The contribution of aerial plant parts versus the root zone to the removal of volatile formaldehyde by potted Fatsia japonica Decne. & Planch. and Ficus benjamina L. plants was assessed during the day and night. The removal capacity of the entire plant, aerial plant parts, and root zone was determined by exposing the relevant parts to gaseous formaldehyde (2 μL·L −1 ) in airtight chambers (1.0 m 3 ) constructed of inert materials. The rate of formaldehyde removal was initially rapid but decreased as the internal concentration diminished in the chamber. To compare the removal efficiency between species and plant parts, the time interval required to reach 50% of the initial concentration was determined (96 and 123 min for entire plants of F. japonica and F. benjamina , respectively). In both species, the aerial plant parts reduced the formaldehyde concentration during the day but removed little during the night. However, the root zone eliminated a substantial amount of formaldehyde during the day and night. The ratio of formaldehyde removal by aerial plant parts versus the root zone was similar for both species, at ≈1:1 during the day and 1:11 at night. The effectiveness of the root zone in formaldehyde removal was due primarily to microorganisms and roots (≈90%); only about 10% was due to adsorption by the growing medium. The results indicate that the root zone is a major contributor to the removal of formaldehyde. A better understanding of formaldehyde metabolism by root zone microflora should facilitate maximizing the phytoremediation efficiency of indoor plants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Attuning to the Chemosphere: Domestic Formaldehyde, Bodily Reasoning, and the Chemical Sublime
Shapiro, N. (2015) · Cultural Anthropology · doi:10.14506/ca30.3.02 · Cited by 517
A review on phytoremediation of contaminants in air, water and soil
Wei, Z., Van Le, Q., Peng, W., Yang, Y., Yang, H., Gu, H., Lam, S. S., & Sonne, C. (2021) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123658 · Cited by 419
Huang, Y., Ho, S., Lu, Y., Niu, R., Xu, L., Cao, J., & Lee, S. (2016) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules21010056 · Cited by 344
Irga, P. J., Torpy, F. R., & Burchett, M. D. (2013) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.04.078 · Cited by 137
Cummings, B. E., & Waring, M. S. (2020) · Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology · doi:10.1038/s41370-019-0175-9 · Cited by 98
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, K. J., Kil, M. J., Song, J. S., Yoo, E. H., Son, K.-C., & Kays, S. J.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 133
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 521-526
- ISSN
- 0003-1062 (ISSN-L)
- 2327-9788
- OpenAlex
- W2160471176
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Efficiency of Volatile Formaldehyde Removal by Indoor Plants: Contribution of Aerial Plant Parts versus the Root Zone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21273/jashs.133.4.521
- The paper
- Kim, K. J., Kil, M. J., Song, J. S., Yoo, E. H., Son, K.-C., & Kays, S. J. (2008). Efficiency of Volatile Formaldehyde Removal by Indoor Plants: Contribution of Aerial Plant Parts versus the Root Zone. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. https://doi.org/10.21273/jashs.133.4.521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.