The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Future of AI Governance: Navigating the Challenges of Generative AI
Open accessAbstract
As artificial intelligence AI technologies continue to advance, the need for effective governance, the need for effective governance frameworks has become increasingly pressing. The rise of generative AIs capable of producing synthetic data, images, and text has raised significant concerns regarding intellectual property, accountability, and the potential for misuse. This article explores the key challenges associated with generative AIs and proposes a comprehensive approach to AI governance, incorporating regulatory reforms, technological innovations, and public awareness initiatives. This article addresses the pressing need for robust AI governance frameworks in response to the growing influence of generative AI technologies. It highlights the legal, ethical, and regulatory challenges, particularly around intellectual property and accountability. The article advocates for reforms in regulation, technological innovations, and public awareness initiatives, proposing solutions such as AI driven tools for disinformation detection and the AI Risk Atlas for identifying risks. The purpose of this article is to explore the challenges posed by generative AI technologies and propose a comprehensive governance framework to address these challenges. This study is significant because it provides a timely analysis of the governance needs for generative AI, which is crucial for ensuring that AI benefits are realized without compromising ethical and legal standards.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The lack of ethical responsibility in the use of these tools increases the risk of perpetuating misinformation, especially in educational settings where the veracity of the content is critical (Gajjar, 2024).”
From Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Gajjar, 2024
In the citing paper
“Experts suggest that international regulatory bodies play a key role in establishing common guidelines that promote responsible innovation (Gajjar, 2024).”
From Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review (2025) · cites this paper as Gajjar, 2024
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ethical and regulatory challenges of Generative AI in education: a systematic review
García-López, I. M., & Trujillo-Liñán, L. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1565938 · Cited by 144
“Experts suggest that international regulatory bodies play a key role in establishing common guidelines that promote responsible innovation (Gajjar, 2024).”
InfluentialNajiburrohman, Baharun, H., Mualimin, Putri, D. F., bin Jali, H., & Maulidy, A. (2026) · International Conference on Enterprise and Industrial System (ICOEINS) · doi:10.1109/icoeins69996.2026.11605438 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Gajjar, V.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gajjar, Vyoma
- Venue
- International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR)
- Published
- 2024-09-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1686-1687
- ISSN
- 2319-7064 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4402988810
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
- Keywords
- AI governance, generative AI, AI regulation, intellectual property, accountability, disinformation detection, AI risk assessment, public awareness, AI ethics, synthetic media
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Future of AI Governance: Navigating the Challenges of Generative AI. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21275/sr24927012739
- The paper
- Gajjar, V. (2024). The Future of AI Governance: Navigating the Challenges of Generative AI. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). https://doi.org/10.21275/sr24927012739