The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Innovating The Medical Imaging Course
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), especially deep learning, have generated tremendous impacts throughout our society, including the tomographic medical imaging field. In contrast to computer vision and image analysis, which have been major application examples of deep learning and deal with existing images, tomographic medical imaging mainly produces cross-sectional or volumetric images of internal structures from sensor measurements. Recently, deep learning has started being actively developed worldwide for medical imaging, including both tomographic reconstruction and image analysis. While medical imaging is a well-established field, in which extensive teaching experience has been accumulated over the past few decades, updating the medical imaging course to reflect AI/ML influence is a new challenge given the rapidly changing landscape of AI-based medical imaging, particularly deep tomographic imaging. In the 2019 fall semester, the medical imaging course at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute was modified to include an AI framework with positive feedback from students. Encouragingly, many students showed a strong motivation to learn AI in classes and hands-on projects, as confirmed in their survey reports. In the 2020 fall semester, we improved this course further, incorporating new advances. This article describes our teaching philosophy, practice, and considerations with respect to integrating deep learning, tomographic imaging, and hands-on programming to redefine the medical imaging course. Furthermore, given the persistent pandemic, online teaching and examination have become an integral part of higher education. These needs will be addressed as well, with the hope of developing an open course in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Wang G. A perspective on deep imaging. IEEE Access. 2016;4:8914-8924. · DOI · Paper page
- Wang G, Kalra M, Orton CG. Machine learning will transform radiology significantly within the next 5 years. Med Phys. 2017;44(6):2041–2044. · DOI
- Wang G, Ye JC, Mueller K, Fessler JA. Image reconstruction is a new frontier of machine learning. IEEE T-MI. 2018;37(6):1289–1296.
- Wang G Zhang Y Ye XJ Mou XQ. Machine learning for tomographic imaging. Philadelphia (PA): IOP Publishing; 2019. · DOI
- Shan HM Padole A Homayounieh F Kruger U Khera RD Nitiwarangkul C Kalra M Wang G. Competitive performance of a modularized deep neural network compared to commercial algorithms for low-dose CT image reconstruction. Nat Mach Intell. 2019;1:269–276. · DOI · Paper page
- Antun V, Renna F, Poon C, Adcock B, Hansen AC. On instabilities of deep learning in image reconstruction and the potential costs of AI. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(48):30088–30095. · DOI
- Suetens P. Fundamentals of medical imaging. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press; 2009. · DOI
- 10.20944/preprints202004.0327.v1 · DOI
- 10.20944/preprints202004.0327.v1 · DOI
- 10.20944/preprints202005.0502.v1 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Wiedeman, C., Xie, H., Mou, X., & Wang, G.
- Venue
- Technology and Innovation
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 351-361
- ISSN
- 1949-8241
- 1949-825X
- Cited by
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovating The Medical Imaging Course. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.21300/21.4.2020.5
- The paper
- Wiedeman, C., Xie, H., Mou, X., & Wang, G. (2020). Innovating The Medical Imaging Course. Technology and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.21300/21.4.2020.5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.