Cited by 62Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactDrug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection

Induction of Apoptosis and CYP4A1 Expression in Sprague-Dawley Rats Exposed to Low Doses of Perfluorooctane Sulfonate

Open access
Kim, Hyung-Sub, Jun Kwack, Seung, Sik Han, Eui, Seok Kang, Tae, Hee Kim, Seung, Young Han, Soon·2011·The Journal of Toxicological Sciences

Abstract

In previous studies, perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS), an environmental organic compound, was reported to cause hepatotoxicity and hypolipidemia in rodents. However, the low dose toxicity of PFOS and the toxic mechanisms involved remain to be determined. To clarify the low dose toxicity and action mechanism in the target organ toxicity, Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were orally administered with PFOS at the doses of 0, 1.25, 5, 10 mg/kg/day for 28 days. As a result, no death or abnormal symptoms were observed in all groups. The significant loss of mean body weight was observed in female rats treated with 10 mg/kg PFOS and the relative liver weight of 10 mg/kg PFOS-treated group was significantly greater compared to control. Histopathological examination revealed that fatty change was evident in the liver of male rats treated with PFOS (5 and 10 mg/kg) and hypertrophy and cellular swellings in females at the dose of 10 mg/kg, which showed different pattern of pathological lesions. In addition, we demonstrated the expression induction of hepatic caspase-3 and cytochrome P450 4A1 (CYP4A1) related with apoptosis and lipid metabolism, respectively. This study suggested that no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) of PFOS was 1.25 mg/kg in 28-day repeated toxicity study and, however, the toxic response showed gender differences. The possible toxic mechanism of PFOS was the induction of apoptosis and altering lipid metabolism which resulted in hepatotoxicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2131/jts.36.201

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Animal studies have demonstrated PFAS-associated disruption of hepatic lipid metabolism, which may be mediated in part through interactions with PPARs and contribute to increased risk of NAFLD associated with PFAS exposure.

    “animal studies have demonstrated PFAS associated disruption of hepatic lipid metabolism, which may be mediated, in part, through interactions with PPARs and contribute to increased risk of NAFLD associated with PFAS exposure”

    From A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Impacts of Per- and Polyfluorinated Substances on the Brain and Behavior (2022) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2011

    The Discussion (page not provided) reports that PFOS increased hepatic CYP4A1 expression and disturbed lipid metabolism in rats; it also discusses PPARs as regulators of lipid metabolism. The paper does not establish that PFOS acts through PPARs, and it does not assess whether PFAS exposure increases NAFLD risk. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Animal studies have identified disruptions in hepatic lipid metabolism and induction of apoptosis in the liver with PFAS exposure.

    “animal studies have identified disruptions in hepatic lipid metabolism and induction of apoptosis in the liver with PFAS exposure”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 22 · Cited by 62

Authors
Kim, H.-S., Jun Kwack, S., Sik Han, E., Seok Kang, T., Hee Kim, S., & Young Han, S.
Affiliations
  • Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (KR)
  • Toxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Korea Food and Drug Administration, Osong Health Technology Administrstion Complex
Venue
The Journal of Toxicological Sciences
Published
2011
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
201-210
ISSN
  • 0388-1350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1880-3989
OpenAlex
W2032164646
Cited by
62
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Toxicological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Korea Food and Drug Administration
  • National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection
Keywords
PFOS, low-dose toxicity, hepatotoxicity, apoptosis, caspase-3, CYP4A1, lipid metabolism, hepatic steatosis, liver hypertrophy, sex differences, no-observed-adverse-effect level, repeated-dose toxicity, weight loss
MeSH terms
Cytochrome P450 Family 4, Administration, Oral, Animals, Body Weight, Cell Survival, Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System, Environmental Pollutants, Fatty Liver, Female, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Liver, Male, Organ Size, Gene Expression Regulation, Enzymologic, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Apoptosis, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Toxicity Tests, Hepatocytes, Cytochrome P-450 CYP4A, Lipid Metabolism, Rats, Caspase 3, Hep G2 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review