Cited by 5Forensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

Evaluation of rewarding effects of nitazene analogs: results from conditioned place preference tests and in vivo microdialysis experiments in mice

Open access
Hataoka, Kyoko, Hojo, Motoki, Nomura, Sakiko, Nakagawa, Yoshio, Kawai, Ayaka, Nakamura, Mari, Ikushima, Kiyomi, Alexander, David B. +3 more·2025·The Journal of Toxicological Sciences

Abstract

In illicit drug markets, the most recently expanding new synthetic opioid subclass is benzimidazoles, also known as nitazenes, which were originally developed as analgesics in the 1950s. The emergence of this classical, potent drug family has attracted extensive research interest in the field of forensic toxicology; however, information on their psychological and physical dependence is very limited. Herein, we evaluated the rewarding effects of four nitazene analogs using a battery of in vivo experiments, with a positive control drug (isotonitazene). The four test materials, metonitazene, etodesnitazene, metodesnitazene, and flunitazene, were administered to male C57BL/6J mice by i.p. administration at 0.5, 2, 20, and 20 mg/kg, respectively. In comprehensive behavioral observation tests, representative opioid-related physiological and behavioral states, including analgesia, stereotypic circling behavior, hyperlocomotion, and Straub tail response, were observed. A set of conditioned place preference tests revealed that all the four analogs induced palatability in mice. Furthermore, measurements of dopamine levels in the nucleus accumbens shell by in vivo microdialysis resulted in significant elevations in all test material-treated groups, suggesting that the nitazenes elicit the rewarding effect through a neural circuit originating from the μ-opioid receptor activation at the ventral tegmental area. Our findings add important data regarding the psychological dependence of nitazenes and highlight the abuse potential of these four materials and other prevailing nitazene analogs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2131/jts.50.33

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Nitazenes may carry cardiotoxic potential; computational analyses predict a high probability of hERG potassium channel inhibition, raising concerns about proarrhythmic effects.

    “In addition, nitazenes may carry cardiotoxic potential; computational analyses predict a high probability of hERG potassium channel inhibition, raising concerns about proarrhythmic effects [38,39,40].”

    From Nitazenes: The Emergence of a Potent Synthetic Opioid Threat (2025) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Introduction and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) discuss nitazenes’ opioid activity, rewarding effects, and intoxication risks, but do not address cardiac effects. Searches for hERG inhibition, computational cardiotoxicity predictions, and arrhythmia found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 5

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Paxinos, G. and Franklin, K.B. (2008): The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates., Academic Press, San Diego.

Authors
Hataoka, K., Hojo, M., Nomura, S., Nakagawa, Y., Kawai, A., Nakamura, M., Ikushima, K., Alexander, D. B., Suzuki, J., Suzuki, T., & Inomata, A.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Public Health (JP)
  • Nagoya City University (JP)
Venue
The Journal of Toxicological Sciences
Published
2025
Volume
50
Issue
1
Pages
33-43
ISSN
  • 0388-1350 (ISSN-L)
  • 1880-3989
OpenAlex
W4406091068
Cited by
5
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Toxicological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
nitazenes, benzimidazole, synthetic opioids, rewarding effects, conditioned place preference, dopamine, nucleus accumbens shell, ventral tegmental area, mu-opioid receptor, isotonitazene, abuse liability, psychological dependence, hyperlocomotion
MeSH terms
Analgesics, Opioid, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Psychological, Dopamine, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nitro Compounds, Nucleus Accumbens, Reward, Microdialysis, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review