The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Shaolin Monastery: History, Religion, and the Chinese Martial Arts
Abstract
This book charts the history of the Shaolin Temple and the evolution of its world-renowned martial arts. It considers the economic, political, and religious factors that led Shaolin monks to disregard the Buddhist prohibition against violence and instead create fighting techniques that by the twenty-first century have spread throughout the world. The book examines the monks' relations with successive Chinese regimes, beginning with the assistance they lent to the seventh-century Emperor Li Shimin and culminating more than a millennium later with their complex relations with Qing rulers, who suspected them of rebellion. It reveals the intimate connection between monastic violence and the veneration of the violent divinities of Buddhism and analyzes the Shaolin association of martial discipline and the search for spiritual enlightenment. The exploration of the evolution of Shaolin fighting techniques serves as a prism through which to consider martial-art history in general. The book correlates the emergence of the famous bare-handed techniques of Taiji Quan, Xingyi Quan, and Shaolin Quan in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries to the social, political, and religious trends of that age. It then goes on to argue that these techniques were created not only for fighting, but also for religious and therapeutic purposes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The title 'Shaolin Monk' has been assumed by practitioners so diverse that it stretches our very understanding of Buddhist monasticism.”
From Desiderata for the Principles of Compilation of a Canon of Buddhism and Medicine (2017) · cites this paper as Shahar 2008
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Xiao-hua, C., You, E.-S., Lee, T. J., & Li, X. (2021) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.2477 · Cited by 84
Contesting the Commercialization and Sanctity of Religious Tourism in the Shaolin Monastery, China
Hung, K., Yang, X., Wassler, P., Wang, D., Lin, P. M. C., & Liu, Z. (2016) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.2093 · Cited by 78
Martial Categories: Clarification and Classification
Martínková, I., & Parry, J. (2015) · Journal of the Philosophy of Sport · doi:10.1080/00948705.2015.1038829 · Cited by 36
Chinese Destinations Related to Martial Arts Tourism from the UNESCO Perspective
Skowron-Markowska, S., & Nowakowska, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13147581 · Cited by 19
Religious Culture and Violence in Traditional China
ter Haar, B. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108613392 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Shahar, M.
- Corresponding author
- Shahar, Meir
- Venue
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Hawai'i Press
- Published
- 2008-01-10
- OpenAlex
- W4206470660
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
- Keywords
- Buddhist monasteries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review