Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms
Abstract
"Family Matters in Indian Buddhist Monasticisms" published on by University of Hawai'i Press.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Scholars have persuasively argued that the Vinaya was written as a body of administrative rules chiefly concerned with the sangha's public reputation.
“Although scholars have persuasively argued that the Vinaya was written as a body of administrative rules chiefly concerned with the sangha's public reputation”
From Possessing Enlightenment: Sorcery, Selfhood, and Tragic Responsibility in a Chinese Buddhist Apocryphon (2023) · cites this paper as Clarke 2013
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 48
- Authors
- Clarke, S.
- Corresponding author
- Clarke, Shayne
- Venue
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Hawai'i Press
- Published
- 2013-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W4298514689
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 9.58
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- University of Hawaii Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Classics › Medieval Literature and History
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
- Keywords
- Buddhist monasticism, family, monastic family, Indian Buddhism, monasticism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
