Establishing Core Factors of Risk Management Influencing Performance Outcome of Small and Medium Firm's Construction Projects in Gauteng
Open accessAbstract
The quest for delivering successful construction projects has urged South African small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to adopt risk management in their projects. However, it has been evinced that SMEs projects in South Africa especially in the Gauteng province have encountered poor performances. Thus, this article determines core risk management factors influencing project outcome of SMEs. A deductive approach was embraced using a questionnaire. The data were collected from 181 conveniently sampled respondents in Gauteng, graded from Grade 1 to 6 of the CIDB (Construction Industry Development Board) grading system. The Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS) version 23 was used to analyse the data by computing exploratory factor analysis and multiple regression analysis. It was revealed that SMEs performance outcome is influenced by eight risk management factors. The influential factors are organisational environment, defining project objectives, resource requirements, risk measurement, risk identification, risk assessment, risk response and action planning and monitoring, review and continuous improvement. The risk management factors established in this article are reliable and valid in projects undertaken by SMEs in the South African construction industry and the findings can serve as a guideline for contractors to achieve success in this context. The study may be repeated in other countries globally, however, it cannot be generalised due to the restrictions pertaining to the geographical area.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Project Manager spends 90% of his or her time communicating in order to communicate and manage risk.
“The Project Manager spend 90% of his or her time communicating in order to communicate and manage risk [16].”
From Investigating the Impact of Risk Management on Project Performance in Construction Industry: Evidence from Nigeria (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Risks cannot be completely eliminated but can be managed throughout the project.
“it is worthy to note that risks cannot be completely eliminated but can be managed throughout the project [16].”
From Investigating the Impact of Risk Management on Project Performance in Construction Industry: Evidence from Nigeria (2021) · cites this paper as [16]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ahmed Bukar, A., & Abbas Ibrahim, U. (2021) · Science Journal of Business and Management · doi:10.11648/j.sjbm.20210903.20 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Renault, B. Y., Agumba, J. N., & Ansary, N.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY)
- Tshwane University of Technology (ZA)
- Corresponding author
- Berenger Yembi Renault
- Venue
- Journal of Construction in Developing Countries
- Publisher
- Universiti Sains Malaysia
- Published
- 2020-12-15
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 93-127
- ISSN
- 1823-6499 (ISSN-L)
- 2180-4222
- OpenAlex
- W3110859533
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Construction in Developing Countries (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- University of Johannesburg
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Occupational Health and Safety Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
- Keywords
- construction risk management, small and medium-sized enterprises, construction project performance, risk identification, risk assessment, risk response planning, risk monitoring and review, organizational context, project objectives, resource requirements, risk measurement, South African construction industry, Gauteng
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review