The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Sand and Water Culture Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition: By E. J. Hewitt. Farnham Royal, Bucks, England: The Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. 241 pages (illus.). 1952. $6.25
Abstract
Since its appearanc e in 1952, Technical Communication no. 22 of the Commonwealt h Bureau of Horticulture and Plantation Crops has come to be recognized, at least in the English language, as the standar d reference for those interested in the developmen t of sand and water culture techniques used in plant nutrition research throughout the British Commonwealth , parts of Europe, and the United States. The Second Edition of this valuabl e work wil l strengthen even further the unique position it occupies. Most (395 of its 477 pages of text) of the book is devoted to a general review of the subject . A second part deal s in somewhat more detai l with the procedures used by the author at Long Ashton. The completenes s of treatment of the subject matter is best attested by the number of references . Their listing, with complet e titles and cross-indexing , requires 55 pages, which gives an estimated number of 1,800 references . The earliest reference date noted was 1699, the latest , 1964. They are primarily from Great Britain and the United States, but paper s from German, French, Russian, and Japanes e publications are also included. The section devoted to the historical developmen t of plant culture techniques is much longer than in the First Edition. The book represent s very much more than a historical account ing, however . It provides in great detail, and with numerous drawings where appropriate, information on every aspect of plant nutrition research . Likely problems that might be encountere d are presented , and the advantage s and disadvantage s of many of the procedures employed and material s used are discussed . A very useful feature of the book are the conclusions and summaries given after some of the topics are discusse d in detail. It wil l serve well the needs of both the researche r actively engaged in plant nutrition studies as well as the teacher seeking material for classroom presentation . With one important exception, the headings into which the subject matter is divided are identical to those of the earlier edition. However, many sections have been completel y revised, and the more recent findings have been added to practicall y all of them. A 30-page section on the "Assessmen t of contamination and the limitations of micronutrient deficiency studies" is a new and valuable addition to the Second Edition. Much of the material which was previousl y reviewed by R. E. Thiers and R. L. Mitchell is included in this section, but the results of some of the studies at Long Ashton are also presented . In the reviewer' s opinion two features of the book could be improved. I found that it took some time to get accustome d to the numbering system used for chapters , sections, and subsections , and the designation of topics in the index in this manner.Search iri g for topics in the text designate d by this numbering system is much slower than finding them by page number designation. A second shortcoming of the book is the kind of binding used. Unless the copy I received was not typical, the pages are not bound securel y and consequentl y wil l pull loose quite readily. I hope this is not generall y true as I believe that the book wil l be subject to heavy use in any laborator y where plant nutrition studies are being conducted.—V. V. Rendig, Dept, of Soils & Plant Nutrition, University of California, Dans.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Strigolactone inhibition of shoot branching
Gomez-Roldan, V., Fermas, S., Brewer, P. B., Puech-Pagès, V., Dun, E. A., Pillot, J.-P., Letisse, F., Matusova, R., Danoun, S., Portais, J.-C., et al. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07271 · Cited by 2,281
The physiology of metal toxicity in plants
Foy, C. D., Chaney, R. L., & White, M. C. (1978) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.29.060178.002455 · Cited by 2,170
VARIATION IN PLANT RESPONSE TO NATIVE AND EXOTIC ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI
Klironomos, J. N. (2003) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/02-0413 · Cited by 1,213
A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging
Campbell, B. D., Grime, J. P., & Mackey, J. M. L. (1991) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00320417 · Cited by 401
CRICK, J. C., & GRIME, J. P. (1987) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb00192.x · Cited by 326
Metadata
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1952-12
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 646-646
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W1979568752
- Cited by
- 2,703
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sand and Water Culture Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition: By E. J. Hewitt. Farnham Royal, Bucks, England: The Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. 241 pages (illus.). 1952. $6.25. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj1952.00021962004400120018x
- The paper
- Sand and Water Culture Methods Used in the Study of Plant Nutrition: By E. J. Hewitt. Farnham Royal, Bucks, England: The Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. 241 pages (illus.). 1952. $6.25. (1952). Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1952.00021962004400120018x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.