CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 6Plant responses to elevated CO2Botany and Plant Ecology StudiesEnvironmental Quality and Pollution

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Air Pollution With Relation to Agronomic Crops: III. Vegetation Survey Methods in Air Pollution Studies

Cole, Gordon A.·1958·Agronomy Journal
DOI 10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000090017x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000090017x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cole, G. A.
Affiliations
Tennessee Valley Authority (US)
Corresponding author
Cole, Gordon A.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1958-09
Volume
50
Issue
9
Pages
553-555
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
DOI
10.2134/agronj1958.00021962005000090017x
OpenAlex
W2081215901
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental Quality and Pollution
Keywords
air pollution, field crops, vegetation survey, vegetation monitoring, crop damage, air pollution effects on plants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review