Cited by 403Crop Yield and Soil FertilityClimate change impacts on agricultureAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

Temperature and Solar Radiation Effects on Potential Maize Yield across Locations

Muchow, R. C., Sinclair, T. R., Bennett, J. M.·1990·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

The objective of this analysis was to use a simple, mechanistic crop growth model to examine the effects of variation in solar radiation and temperature on potential maize (Zea mays L.) yield among locations. Crop phenology and leaf growth were calculated from daily mean temperature data obtained at the five locations studied. Daily biomass accumulation was calculated by estimating the amount of radiation intercepted and assuming maximum crop radiation use efficiency of 1.6 g MJ−1. Grain yield accumulation was simulated using a linear increase in harvest index during grain filling. Observed and simulated grain yields were compared for several sowings at each of five localions ranging from latitude 14°S to 40°N lat. Averaged across sowings, respective observed and simulated oven‐dry grain yields (g m−2) were 816 and 830 at Katherine, Australia; 953 and 908 at Gainesville, FL; 1059 and 1106 at Quincy, FL; 1091 and 1119 at Champaign, IL; and 1580 and 1626 at Grand Junction, CO. Temperature primarily affected growth duration with lower temperature increasing the length of time that the crop could intercept radiation. The solar radiation response was related to the amount of incident radiation and to the fraction of radiation intercepted by the crop. In the tropics (Katherine), high temperature decreased the duration of growth and grain yield, despite high levels of radiation. Only at locations with low temperature and consequent long growth duration. and with high radiation were…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj1990.00021962008200020033x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muchow, R. C., Sinclair, T. R., & Bennett, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Sinclair, T. R.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-03
Volume
82
Issue
2
Pages
338-343
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W1991281905
Cited by
403
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 18
FWCI
16.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
maize yield, solar radiation, temperature effects, crop growth simulation, crop phenology, radiation interception, radiation use efficiency, grain yield simulation, harvest index, growth duration, latitude, yield potential

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review