The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Utilization of Allelopathy for Weed Management in Agroecosystems
Abstract
Biorational alternatives are gaining increased attention for weed control because of concerns related to pesticide usage and dwindling numbers of labeled products, particularly for minor‐use crops. Allelopathy offers potential for biorational weed control through the production and release of allelochemics from leaves, flowers, seeds, stems, and roots of living or decomposing plant materials. Under appropriate conditions, allelochemics may be released in quantities suppressive to developing weed seedlings. Allelochemics often exhibit selectivity, similar to synthetic herbicides. Two main approaches have been investigated for allelopathic weed suppression. One is use of living rotational crops or mulches that interfere with the growth of surrounding weeds [e.g., tall red fescue, Festuca arundinacea Schreb.; creeping red fescue, F. rubra L. subsp. commutata; asparagus, Asparagus officinalis L. var. altilis); sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench; alfalfa, Medicago sativa L.; black mustard, Brassica nigra (L.) Koch; and oat, Avena sativa L.]. Attempts to select germplasm with enhanced suppressive ability have been limited. The second is use of cover crop residues or living mulches to suppress weed growth for variable lengths of time (e.g., winter rye, Secale cereale L.; winter wheat, Triticum aestivum L.; and sorghum). Cover crop residues may selectively provide weed suppression through their physical presence on the soil surface and by release of allelochemics or microbially altered allelochemics. The ability to understand the physiological basis for allelopathy in a crop plant may allow the weed scientist or ecologist to work closely with molecular biologists or traditional plant breeders to selectively enhance the traits responsible for weed suppression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. A review
Wezel, A., Casagrande, M., Celette, F., Vian, J.-F., Ferrer, A., & Peigné, J. (2014) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-013-0180-7 · Cited by 1,227
Integration of soil, crop and weed management in low‐external‐input farming systems
Liebman, & Davis (2000) · Weed Research · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3180.2000.00164.x · Cited by 578
Flavonoids: Their Structure, Biosynthesis and Role in the Rhizosphere, Including Allelopathy
Weston, L. A., & Mathesius, U. (2013) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-013-0248-5 · Cited by 465
Self-citationEdible and Tended Wild Plants, Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Agroecology
Turner, N. J., Łuczaj, Ł. J., Migliorini, P., Pieroni, A., Dreon, A. L., Sacchetti, L. E., & Paoletti, M. G. (2011) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352689.2011.554492 · Cited by 358
Challenges and opportunities in implementing allelopathy for natural weed management
Bhowmik, P. C., & Inderjit (2003) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/s0261-2194(02)00242-9 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- Weston, L. A.
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 860-866
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W2062692655
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Utilization of Allelopathy for Weed Management in Agroecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962003600060004x
- The paper
- Weston, L. A. (1996). Utilization of Allelopathy for Weed Management in Agroecosystems. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1996.00021962003600060004x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.