Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 443

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Use of Remote‐Sensing Imagery to Estimate Corn Grain Yield

Shanahan, John F., Schepers, James S., Francis, Dennis D., Varvel, Gary E., Wilhelm, Wallace W., Tringe, James M., Schlemmer, Mike R., Major, David J.·2001·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Remote sensing—the process of acquiring information about objects from remote platforms such as ground‐based booms, aircraft, or satellites—is a potentially important source of data for site‐specific crop management, providing both spatial and temporal information. Our objective was to use remotely sensed imagery to compare different vegetation indices as a means of assessing canopy variation and its resultant impact on corn (Zea mays L.) grain yield. Treatments consisted of five N rates and four hybrids, which were grown under irrigation near Shelton, NE on a Hord silt loam in 1997 and 1998. Imagery data with 0.5‐m spatial resolution were collected from aircraft on several dates during both seasons using a multispectral, four‐band [blue, green, red, and near‐infrared reflectance] digital camera system. Imagery was imported into a geographical information system (GIS) and then georegistered, converted into reflectance, and used to compute three vegetation indices. Grain yield for each plot was determined at maturity. Results showed that green normalized difference vegetation index (GNDVI) values derived from images acquired during midgrain filling were the most highly correlated with grain yield; maximum correlations were 0.7 and 0.92 in 1997 and 1998, respectively. Normalizing GNDVI and grain yield variability within hybrids improved the correlations in both years, but more dramatic increases were observed in 1997 (0.7 to 0.82) than in 1998 (0.92 to 0.95). This suggested GNDVI acquired during midgrain filling could be used to produce relative yield maps depicting spatial variability in fields, offering a potentially attractive alternative to use of a combine yield monitor.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2001.933583x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 443

Metadata

Authors
Shanahan, J. F., Schepers, J. S., Francis, D. D., Varvel, G. E., Wilhelm, W. W., Tringe, J. M., Schlemmer, M. R., & Major, D. J.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2001-05
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
583-589
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2075844317
Cited by
443
References
17
FWCI
11.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Remote‐Sensing Imagery to Estimate Corn Grain Yield. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2001.933583x
The paper
Shanahan, J. F., Schepers, J. S., Francis, D. D., Varvel, G. E., Wilhelm, W. W., Tringe, J. M., Schlemmer, M. R., & Major, D. J. (2001). Use of Remote‐Sensing Imagery to Estimate Corn Grain Yield. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.933583x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.