The DOI matches its OpenAlex record.
Spatial and Temporal Variation in Economically Optimum Nitrogen Rate for Corn
Abstract
The economically optimum N rate (EONR) required for corn (Zea mays L.) may vary spatially due to variation in soil characteristics and temporally due to the interactions of environmental factors. The objectives of this research were to quantify the impact of field variability on the yield response of corn to N fertilization and to evaluate the temporal stability of these response functions. A production field near Revere, MN, was cropped with corn in 1995, 1997, and 1999 in rotation with soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]. Four replications of seven treatments were established in a split-plot arrangement of a randomized complete block design. Main plots consisted of three N rates (0, 67, 134, and 202 kg ha−1) while the split plots were two rates (0 and 0.56 kg ha−1) of nitrapyrin [2-chloro-6 (trichloromethyl)-pyridine]. Each replication was divided into subblocks to estimate spatial patterns in yield N response and EONR. Spatial analysis indicated that only half of the field responded to N. Uniform application recommendation of 145 kg N ha−1 for the whole field overfertilized these areas while other areas were underfertilized. Variable-rate N applications according to the EONR would have resulted in 69 and 75 kg ha−1 less N being applied than the uniform N rate in 1997 and 1999, respectively. Potential economic benefits were $8 and $23 ha−1 higher than the uniform N rate in 1997 and 1999, respectively. Approximately 60% of the field responded in a similar manner in both 1997 and 1999, suggesting that temporal variations must also be considered with site-specific N management.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nitrogen in agriculture: balancing the cost of an essential resource
Robertson, G. P., & Vitousek, P. M. (2009) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046 · Cited by 1,177
A Review of Methods to Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Agriculture
Sharma, L., & Bali, S. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10010051 · Cited by 319
Liu, W., Yuan, Y., & Koropeckyj-Cox, L. (2021) · Transactions of the ASABE · doi:10.13031/trans.14078 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Mamo, M., Malzer, G. L., MULLA, D. J., Huggins, D. R., & Strock, J. S.
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 958-958
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044079993
- Cited by
- 213
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spatial and Temporal Variation in Economically Optimum Nitrogen Rate for Corn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2003.0958
- The paper
- Mamo, M., Malzer, G. L., MULLA, D. J., Huggins, D. R., & Strock, J. S. (2003). Spatial and Temporal Variation in Economically Optimum Nitrogen Rate for Corn. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.0958
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.