The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Improving Physiological Assumptions Of Simulation Models By Using Gene‐Based Approaches
Abstract
Application of crop models to plant breeding has been limited, in part due to the restricted capabilities of models to accurately represent genetic differences and genotype-induced crop responses. A gene-based model, GeneGro, was developed to simulate the effects of seven genes on growth and developmental processes in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and was published in 1996. The objective of this paper is to describe the improvements that were made in GeneGro to incorporate the effect of the Tip gene. Presence of the Tip gene in photoperiod-sensitive cultivars reduces the inhibitory effect of low temperature on photoperiod sensitivity of flowering. A mechanistic approach, further guided by information on two other genes affecting photoperiod response, i.e., Ppd and Hr, was used to incorporate the effect of the Tip gene. In the modified GeneGro, this inhibitory effect is reduced under cooler temperatures ranging from 15 to 20°C for the mean daily temperature. However, in the presence of Tip, no such reduction occurs. For the calibration data, GeneGro explained 75% of the variation in days to flower vs. 61% for the original model. For an extensive evaluation data set, the modification explained 72% of the variation in days to flower vs. 70% for the original version while days to maturity, seed yield, canopy dry mass, and harvest index showed no improvement. These results reflect two major constraints to effective use of gene-based approaches in crop modeling. The first is…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There are three genotype files in CROPGRO: one each for cultivar, ecotype, and species coefficients.
“There are three genotype files: one each for cultivar, ecotype, and species coefficients (Hoogenboom and White, 2003).”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Hoogenboom and White, 2003
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 37 · Cited by 63
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500010037x · DOI
- Bennett J.H., 1992, High temperature stress in Phaseolus vulgaris seedlings: Genotype iron stress‐response interactions, Plant Physiol. Biochem., 30, 11
- 10.2134/1994.physiologyanddetermination.c34 · DOI
- 10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000030011x · DOI
- Evans L.T., 1975, Daylength and the flowering of plants
- 10.1023/A:1018340514388 · DOI
- 10.13031/2013.28833 · DOI
- Hoogenboom G., 1988, Research on drought tolerance in common bean, 192
- 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900040013x · DOI
- 10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600010032x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500050025x · DOI
- 10.2134/agronj2000.9261140x · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00258178 · DOI
- 10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300050021x · DOI
- Laing D.R., 1984, The physiology of tropical field crops, 305
- 10.2135/cropsci2001.41140x · DOI
- Pabico J.P., 1999, Determination of cultivar coefficients of crop models using a genetic algorithm: A conceptual framework, Trans. ASAE, 42, 223, 10.13031/2013.13199 · DOI
- 10.13031/2013.19391 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00024-X · DOI
- Sexton P.J., 1994, Early‐season growth in relation to region of domestication, seed size, and leaf traits in common bean, Field Crops Res., 52, 69, 10.1016/S0378-4290(96)03452-1 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109353 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0014479700016756 · DOI
- Vallejos C.E., 1991, Linkage between isozyme markers and a locus affecting seed size in Phaseolus vulgaris L, Theor. Appl. Genet., 81, 413, 10.1007/BF00228685 · DOI
- Wallace D.H., 1985, Physiological aspects of plant maturity, adaptation and yield, Plant Breed. Rev., 3, 21, 10.1002/9781118061008.ch2 · DOI
- 10.21273/JASHS.116.3.534 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00223803 · DOI
- Welch S.M., 2000, Estimating genetic coefficients for a soybean growth model
- Welch S.M. J.Zhang N.Sun andT. YuMak.2000b.Efficient estimation of genetic coefficients for crop models [CD‐ROM].InW. Bowen et al. (ed.) Proc. SAAD‐3 Symp. Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (UNALM) Lima Peru. 8–10 Nov. 1999. Int. Potato Cent. Lima Peru.
- 10.1071/PP9900189 · DOI
- 10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800030009x · DOI
- 10.2134/agronj2003.5200 · DOI
- 10.1017/S001447970002531X · DOI
- White J.W., 1996, Inheritance of temperature sensitivity of the photoperiod response in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Euphytica, 91, 5, 10.1007/BF00035270 · DOI
- 10.1016/0378-4290(89)90062-2 · DOI
- 10.1093/jxb/44.12.1795 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoogenboom, G., & White, J. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Georgia (US)
- Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
- Corresponding author
- Hoogenboom, Gerrit
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 82-89
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W2027357508
- Cited by
- 63
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 6.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
- Keywords
- Phaseolus vulgaris, photoperiod sensitivity, flowering time, low temperature effects, Ppd genes, HR gene, gene-environment interaction, days to flowering, model calibration, plant breeding
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review