Cited by 63Genetics and Plant BreedingGenetic and Environmental Crop StudiesAgricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Improving Physiological Assumptions Of Simulation Models By Using Gene‐Based Approaches

Hoogenboom, Gerrit, White, Jeffrey W.·2003·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Application of crop models to plant breeding has been limited, in part due to the restricted capabilities of models to accurately represent genetic differences and genotype-induced crop responses. A gene-based model, GeneGro, was developed to simulate the effects of seven genes on growth and developmental processes in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and was published in 1996. The objective of this paper is to describe the improvements that were made in GeneGro to incorporate the effect of the Tip gene. Presence of the Tip gene in photoperiod-sensitive cultivars reduces the inhibitory effect of low temperature on photoperiod sensitivity of flowering. A mechanistic approach, further guided by information on two other genes affecting photoperiod response, i.e., Ppd and Hr, was used to incorporate the effect of the Tip gene. In the modified GeneGro, this inhibitory effect is reduced under cooler temperatures ranging from 15 to 20°C for the mean daily temperature. However, in the presence of Tip, no such reduction occurs. For the calibration data, GeneGro explained 75% of the variation in days to flower vs. 61% for the original model. For an extensive evaluation data set, the modification explained 72% of the variation in days to flower vs. 70% for the original version while days to maturity, seed yield, canopy dry mass, and harvest index showed no improvement. These results reflect two major constraints to effective use of gene-based approaches in crop modeling. The first is…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2003.8200

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 37 · Cited by 63

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. 10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500010037x · DOI
  2. Bennett J.H., 1992, High temperature stress in Phaseolus vulgaris seedlings: Genotype iron stress‐response interactions, Plant Physiol. Biochem., 30, 11
  3. 10.2134/1994.physiologyanddetermination.c34 · DOI
  4. 10.2135/cropsci1970.0011183X001000030011x · DOI
  5. Evans L.T., 1975, Daylength and the flowering of plants
  6. 10.1023/A:1018340514388 · DOI
  7. 10.13031/2013.28833 · DOI
  8. Hoogenboom G., 1988, Research on drought tolerance in common bean, 192
  9. 10.2134/agronj1997.00021962008900040013x · DOI
  10. 10.2134/agronj1994.00021962008600010032x · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.2134/agronj1993.00021962008500050025x · DOI
  12. 10.2134/agronj2000.9261140x · DOI
  13. 10.1007/BF00258178 · DOI
  14. 10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183X003300050021x · DOI
  15. Laing D.R., 1984, The physiology of tropical field crops, 305
  16. 10.2135/cropsci2001.41140x · DOI
  17. Pabico J.P., 1999, Determination of cultivar coefficients of crop models using a genetic algorithm: A conceptual framework, Trans. ASAE, 42, 223, 10.13031/2013.13199 · DOI
  18. 10.13031/2013.19391 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0308-521X(00)00024-X · DOI
  20. Sexton P.J., 1994, Early‐season growth in relation to region of domestication, seed size, and leaf traits in common bean, Field Crops Res., 52, 69, 10.1016/S0378-4290(96)03452-1 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109353 · DOI
  22. 10.1017/S0014479700016756 · DOI
  23. Vallejos C.E., 1991, Linkage between isozyme markers and a locus affecting seed size in Phaseolus vulgaris L, Theor. Appl. Genet., 81, 413, 10.1007/BF00228685 · DOI
  24. Wallace D.H., 1985, Physiological aspects of plant maturity, adaptation and yield, Plant Breed. Rev., 3, 21, 10.1002/9781118061008.ch2 · DOI
  25. 10.21273/JASHS.116.3.534 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/BF00223803 · DOI
  27. Welch S.M., 2000, Estimating genetic coefficients for a soybean growth model
  28. Welch S.M. J.Zhang N.Sun andT. YuMak.2000b.Efficient estimation of genetic coefficients for crop models [CD‐ROM].InW. Bowen et al. (ed.) Proc. SAAD‐3 Symp. Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (UNALM) Lima Peru. 8–10 Nov. 1999. Int. Potato Cent. Lima Peru.
  29. 10.1071/PP9900189 · DOI
  30. 10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800030009x · DOI
  31. 10.2134/agronj2003.5200 · DOI
  32. 10.1017/S001447970002531X · DOI
  33. White J.W., 1996, Inheritance of temperature sensitivity of the photoperiod response in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), Euphytica, 91, 5, 10.1007/BF00035270 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/0378-4290(89)90062-2 · DOI
  35. 10.1093/jxb/44.12.1795 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Hoogenboom, G., & White, J. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maíz Y Trigo (MX)
Corresponding author
Hoogenboom, Gerrit
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
82-89
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2027357508
Cited by
63
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agricultural Productivity and Crop Improvement
Keywords
Phaseolus vulgaris, photoperiod sensitivity, flowering time, low temperature effects, Ppd genes, HR gene, gene-environment interaction, days to flowering, model calibration, plant breeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review