Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 237

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Field‐Scale Variability in Optimal Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate for Corn

Scharf, Peter C., Kitchen, Newell R., Sudduth, Kenneth A., Davis, J. Glenn, Hubbard, Victoria C., Lory, John A.·2005·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Applying only as much N fertilizer as is needed by a crop has economic and environmental benefits. Understanding variability in need for N fertilizer within individual fields is necessary to guide approaches to meeting crop needs while minimizing N inputs and losses. Our objective was to characterize the spatial variability of corn (Zea mays L.) N need in production corn fields. Eight experiments were conducted in three major soil areas (Mississippi Delta alluvial, deep loess, claypan) over 3 yr. Treatments were field‐length strips of discrete N rates from 0 to 280 kg N ha−1. Yield data were partitioned into 20‐m increments, and a quadratic‐plateau function was used to describe yield response to N rate for each 20‐m section. Economically optimal N fertilizer rate (EONR) was very different between fields and was also highly variable within fields. Median EONR for individual fields ranged from 63 to 208 kg N ha−1, indicating a need to manage N fertilizer differently for different fields. In seven of the eight fields, a uniform N application at the median EONR would cause more than half of the field to be over‐ or underfertilized by at least 34 kg N ha−1. Coarse patterns of spatial variability in EONR were observed in some fields, but fine and complex patterns were also observed in most fields. This suggests that the use of a few appropriate management zones per field might produce some benefits but that N management systems using spatially dense information have potential for greater benefits. Our results suggest that further attempts to develop systems for predicting and addressing spatially variable N needs are justified in these production environments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2005.0452

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 237

Metadata

Authors
Scharf, P. C., Kitchen, N. R., Sudduth, K. A., Davis, J. G., Hubbard, V. C., & Lory, J. A.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03
Volume
97
Issue
2
Pages
452-461
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2057198357
Cited by
237
References
0
FWCI
18.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Field‐Scale Variability in Optimal Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate for Corn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2005.0452
The paper
Scharf, P. C., Kitchen, N. R., Sudduth, K. A., Davis, J. G., Hubbard, V. C., & Lory, J. A. (2005). Field‐Scale Variability in Optimal Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate for Corn. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2005.0452

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.