The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Modeling of Cotton Yields in the Amu Darya River Floodplains of Uzbekistan Integrating Multitemporal Remote Sensing and Minimum Field Data
Abstract
Increased knowledge about the spatial distribution of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yield in the Khorezm region in Uzbekistan supports the optimal allocation of resources. This research estimated the spatial distribution of cotton yields in Khorezm by integrating remote sensing, field data, and modeling. The agro‐meteorological model used was based on Monteith's biomass production model with multitemporal MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer)‐derived parameters from 2002 as primary inputs. The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and environmental stress scalars on crop development were estimated with meteorological information. Using high‐spatial‐resolution Landsat 7 ETM+ images, the cotton area was extracted and the cotton fraction determined within the coarse spatial resolution MODIS pixels. The spatial resolution of the MODIS FPAR data was improved by using an empirical relationship to the higher‐resolution MODIS NDVI (Normalized Difference Vegetation Index) data. The estimated raw cotton yield ranged from 1.09 to 3.76 Mg ha−1. The modeling revealed a spatial trend of higher yields in upstream areas and in locations closer to the irrigation channels and lower yields in downstream areas and at sites more distant to the channels. The validated yield estimations showed a 10% deviation from official governmental statistics. The established agro‐meteorological model based on freely available MODIS data and a minimum of field data input is a promising technique for economic and operational late‐season estimation of spatially distributed cotton yield over large regions on which management adjustments could be made.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The difference between modeled seed cotton yield estimations and published government data was within 10%.”
From Development and Application of Process-based Simulation Models for Cotton Production: A Review of Past, Present, and Future Directions (2014) · cites this paper as Shi et al. (2007)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- Allen R.G., 1998, Crop evapotranspiration: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements
- 10.2135/cropsci2002.1943 · DOI
- Bain L.J., 1992, Introduction to probability and mathematical statistics
- 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00034-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90080-P · DOI
- BISNIS, 2004, Business Information Service for the Newly Independent States
- Coll C., 2004, Ground measurements for the validation of land surface temperatures derived from AATSR and MODIS data, Remote Sens. Environ., 97, 288, 10.1016/j.rse.2005.05.007 · DOI
- Conrad C. G.R.Ruecker R.R.Colditz G.Strunz andS.Dech.2004a.Crop monitoring using multi‐temporal MODIS remote sensing data in Khorezm.InHumboldt‐workshop “The Use of GIS And Simulation Models For Research And Decision Support in Central Asia ” Tashkent Uzbekistan 9–11 July 2004.
- Conrad C. G.R.Ruecker C.Schweitzer S.Dech andM.Hafeez.2004b.Modeling seasonal actual evapotranspiration with remote sensing and GIS in Khorezm region Uzbekistan.InProc. of the 11th SPIE International Symposium on Remote Sensing Maspalomas Gran Canaria/Spain 13–16 Sept. 2004. · DOI
- Dalezios N.R., 2001, Cotton yield estimation based on NOAA/AVHRR produced NDVI, Phys. Chem. Earth (B), 26, 247, 10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00247-1 · DOI
- Doraiswamy P.C., 2003, Crop conditions and yield simulations using Landsat and MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 92, 548, 10.1016/j.rse.2004.05.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.rse.2004.04.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/0034-4257(94)00066-V · DOI
- 10.1016/S0098-3004(03)00050-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00140-4 · DOI
- Greene W.H., 2003, Econometric analysis, fifth edition
- 10.1080/01431169308953983 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1985)111:3(265) · DOI
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00096-2 · DOI
- Journel A.G., 1978, Mining geostatistics
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00084-6 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1017181826899 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0167-8809(02)00021-X · DOI
- 10.2307/2401901 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1977.0140 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/014311698215586 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00074-3 · DOI
- 10.2307/2845983 · DOI
- Pyndick R.S., 1998, Econometric models and economic forecast
- 10.1080/01431169308904332 · DOI
- Ressl R., 1998, Desertification monitoring and land use optimization in the Aral Sea area with GIS, GIS Zeitschrift für Geoinformationssysteme, 6, 25
- 10.2134/agronj1991.00021962008300040001x · DOI
- Ruecker G.R., 2003, ZEF Work Papers for Sustainable Development
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00061-9 · DOI
- Schweitzer C.2005.Entwicklung eines wissensbasierten Klassifizierungsansatzes zur Kartierung der Landnutzung in Khorezm (Usbekistan) auf der Basis von Expertenwissen GIS‐Daten sowie multi‐spektralen/multitemporalen Landsat/MODIS Daten. Master thesis Univ. of Göttingen.
- 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00267-9 · DOI
- Smith M., 1991, Report on the expert consultation for the revision of FAO methodology of crop water requirements
- Supit I., 1994, Global radiation
- Sys I.C., 1991, Land evaluation, Part I: Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculation
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00022-X · DOI
- Varlet‐Grancher C., 1982, Efficience de la conversion de l’énergie solaire par un couvert végétal, Acta Oecologia. Oecol. Plant., 3, 3
- Vlek P.L.G., 2003, ZEF Work Papers for Sustainable Development in Central Asia, 1
- 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00278-4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, Z., Ruecker, G. R., Mueller, M., Conrad, C., Ibragimov, N., Lamers, J. P. A., Martius, C., Strunz, G., Dech, S., & Vlek, P. L. G.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
- European Commission (BE)
- University of Würzburg (DE)
- Uzbekistan National Cotton Growing Research Institute P.O. Box Akkavak 702133 Tashkent Uzbekistan
- University of Bonn (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Ruecker, Gerd R.
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1317-1326
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W2060077464
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
- elib (German Aerospace Center) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Frauen (0339970C)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Keywords
- cotton yield estimation, Gossypium hirsutum, Khorezm region, NDVI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modeling of Cotton Yields in the Amu Darya River Floodplains of Uzbekistan Integrating Multitemporal Remote Sensing and Minimum Field Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2006.0260
- The paper
- Shi, Z., Ruecker, G. R., Mueller, M., Conrad, C., Ibragimov, N., Lamers, J. P. A., Martius, C., Strunz, G., Dech, S., & Vlek, P. L. G. (2007). Modeling of Cotton Yields in the Amu Darya River Floodplains of Uzbekistan Integrating Multitemporal Remote Sensing and Minimum Field Data. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2006.0260