AquaCrop—The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: I. Concepts and Underlying Principles
Abstract
This article introduces the FAO crop model AquaCrop. It simulates attainable yields of major herbaceous crops as a function of water consumption under rainfed, supplemental, deficit, and full irrigation conditions. The growth engine of AquaCrop is water‐driven , in that transpiration is calculated first and translated into biomass using a conservative, crop‐specific parameter: the biomass water productivity, normalized for atmospheric evaporative demand and air CO 2 concentration. The normalization is to make AquaCrop applicable to diverse locations and seasons. Simulations are performed on thermal time, but can be on calendar time, in daily time‐steps. The model uses canopy ground cover instead of leaf area index (LAI) as the basis to calculate transpiration and to separate out soil evaporation from transpiration. Crop yield is calculated as the product of biomass and harvest index (HI). At the start of yield formation period, HI increases linearly with time after a lag phase, until near physiological maturity. Other than for the yield, there is no biomass partitioning into the various organs. Crop responses to water deficits are simulated with four modifiers that are functions of fractional available soil water modulated by evaporative demand, based on the differential sensitivity to water stress of four key plant processes: canopy expansion, stomatal control of transpiration, canopy senescence, and HI. The HI can be modified negatively or positively, depending on stress level, timing, and canopy duration. AquaCrop uses a relatively small number of parameters (explicit and mostly intuitive) and attempts to balance simplicity, accuracy, and robustness. The model is aimed mainly at practitioner‐type end‐users such as those working for extension services, consulting engineers, governmental agencies, nongovernmental organizations, and various kinds of farmers associations. It is also designed to fit the need of economists and policy specialists who use simple models for planning and scenario analysis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
The DSSAT cropping system model
Jones, J. W., Hoogenboom, G., Porter, C. H., Boote, K. J., Batchelor, W. D., Hunt, L. A., Wilkens, P. W., Singh, U., Gijsman, A. J., & Ritchie, J. T. (2003) · European Journal of Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s1161-0301(02)00107-7 · Cited by 4,465 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Soil Moisture at the Field Scale
Vereecken, H., Huisman, J. A., Pachepsky, Y., Montzka, C., van der Kruk, J., Bogena, H., Weihermüller, L., Herbst, M., Martinez, G., & Vanderborght, J. (2014) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.061 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Agricultural production systems modelling and software: current status and future prospects
Holzworth, D. P., Snow, V., Janssen, S., Athanasiadis, I. N., Donatelli, M., Hoogenboom, G., White, J. W., & Thorburn, P. (2015) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.013 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Qin, Z., Zhuang, Q., & Zhu, X. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12106 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., Raes, D., & Fereres, E.
- Affiliations
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
- University of California, Davis (US)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Steduto, Pasquale
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05
- Volume
- 101
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 426-437
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W1994975670
- Cited by
- 1,878
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 198 · 2025: 185 · 2024: 143 · 2023: 147 · 2022: 163 · 2021: 170 · 2020: 141 · 2019: 126 · 2018: 110 · 2017: 94 · 2016: 83 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 84 · 2013: 56 · 2012: 39
- FWCI
- 52.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- CGIAR Water and Food Challenging
- ICARDA
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
- Keywords
- AquaCrop model, crop yield simulation, drought stress, transpiration, evaporative demand, harvest index, stomatal regulation, soil evaporation, deficit irrigation, rainfed agriculture, supplemental irrigation, thermal time, canopy senescence, crop growth simulation, water stress
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review