Cited by 1,053Irrigation Practices and Water ManagementPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsClimate change impacts on agriculture

AquaCrop — The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: II. Main Algorithms and Software Description

Raes, Dirk, Steduto, Pasquale, Hsiao, Theodore C., Fereres, Elias·2009·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

The AquaCrop model was developed to replace the former FAO I&D Paper 33 procedures for the estimation of crop productivity in relation to water supply and agronomic management in a framework based on current plant physiological and soil water budgeting concepts. This paper presents the software of AquaCrop for which the concepts and underlying principles are described in the companion paper (Steduto et al., 2009). Input consists of weather data, crop characteristics, and soil and management characteristics that define the environment in which the crop will develop. Algorithms and calculation procedures modeling the infiltration of water, the drainage out of the root zone, the canopy and root zone development, the evaporation and transpiration rate, the biomass production, and the yield formation are presented. The mechanisms of crop response to cope with water shortage are described by only a few parameters, making the underlying processes more transparent to the user. AquaCrop is a menu-driven program with a well-developed user interface. With the help of graphs which are updated each time step (1 d) during the simulation run, the user can track changes in soil water content, and the corresponding changes in crop development, soil evaporation and transpiration rate, biomass production, and yield development. One can halt the simulation at each time step, to study the effect of changes in water related inputs, making the model particularly suitable for developing deficit irri…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2008.0140s

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raes, D., Steduto, P., Hsiao, T. C., & Fereres, E.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (IT)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Raes, Dirk
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05
Volume
101
Issue
3
Pages
438-447
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2035110811
Cited by
1,053
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 101 · 2025: 86 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 97 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 70 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 24
FWCI
37.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • CGIAR Water and Food Challenging Program
  • ICARDA
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
AquaCrop model, crop water productivity, deficit irrigation, crop yield simulation, evapotranspiration, soil water infiltration, drainage, crop development, biomass production, water stress response, scenario analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review