Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 344

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Strategies to Make Use of Plant Sensors‐Based Diagnostic Information for Nitrogen Recommendations

Samborski, Stanislaw Marek, Tremblay, Nicolas, Fallon, Edith·2009·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Improvements of nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) may be achieved through the use of sensing tools for N status determination. Leaf and canopy chlorophyll, as well as leaf polyphenolics concentrations, are characteristics strongly affected by N availability that are often used as a surrogate to direct plant N status estimation. Approaches with near‐term operational sensors, handheld and tractor‐mounted, for proximal remote measurements are considered in this review. However, the information provided by these tools is unfortunately biased by factors other than N. To overcome this obstacle, normalization procedures such as the well‐fertilized reference plot, the no‐N reference plot, and relative yield are often used. Methods to establish useful relationships between sensor readings and optimal N rates, such as critical NSI (nitrogen sufficiency index), INSEY (in‐season estimated yield), and the relationship between chlorophyll meter readings, grain yield, and sensor‐determined CI (chlorophyll index) are also reviewed. In a few cases, algorithms for translating readings into actual N fertilizer recommendation have been developed, but their value still seems limited to conditions similar to the ones where the research was conducted. Near‐term operational sensing can benefit from improvements in sensor operational characteristics (size and shape of footprint, positioning) or the choice of light wavebands more suitable for specific conditions (i.e., genotype, growth stage, or crop density). However, one important limitation to their widespread use is the availability of algorithms that would be reliable in a variety of soil and weather conditions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2008.0162rx

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 73 references

Cited by

See all 344

Metadata

Authors
Samborski, S. M., Tremblay, N., & Fallon, E.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
800-816
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2038840988
Cited by
344
References
73
FWCI
15.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Strategies to Make Use of Plant Sensors‐Based Diagnostic Information for Nitrogen Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2008.0162rx
The paper
Samborski, S. M., Tremblay, N., & Fallon, E. (2009). Strategies to Make Use of Plant Sensors‐Based Diagnostic Information for Nitrogen Recommendations. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0162rx

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.