Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 311

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Review on the Challenges for Increased Production of Castor

Open access
Severino, Liv S., Auld, Dick L., Baldanzi, Marco, Cândido, Magno J. D., Chen, Grace, Crosby, William, Tan, D., He, Xiaohua, Lakshmamma, P., Lavanya, C., Machado, Olga L. T., Mielke, Thomas, Milani, Máira, Miller, Travis D., Morris, J. B., Morse, Stephen. A., Navas, Alejandro A., Soares, Dartanhã J., Sofiatti, Valdinei, Wang, Ming L., Zanotto, Maurício D., Zieler, Helge·2012·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Castor (Ricinus communis L.) is one of the oldest cultivated crops, but currently it represents only 0.15% of the vegetable oil produced in the world. Castor oil is of continuing importance to the global specialty chemical industry because it is the only commercial source of a hydroxylated fatty acid. Castor also has tremendous future potential as an industrial oilseed crop because of its high seed oil content (more than 480 g kg−1), unique fatty acid composition (900 g kg−1 of ricinoleic acid), potentially high oil yields (1250–2500 L ha−1), and ability to be grown under drought and saline conditions. The scientific literature on castor has been generated by a relatively small global community of researchers over the past century. Much of this work was published in dozens of languages in journals that are not easily accessible to the scientific community. This review was conducted to provide a compilation of the most relevant historic research information and define the tremendous future potential of castor. The article was prepared by a group of 22 scientists from 16 institutions and eight countries. Topics discussed in this review include: (i) germplasm, genetics, breeding, biotic stresses, genome sequencing, and biotechnology; (ii) agronomic production practices, diseases, and abiotic stresses; (iii) management and reduction of toxins for the use of castor meal as both an animal feed and an organic fertilizer; (iv) future industrial uses of castor including renewable fuels; (v) world production, consumption, and prices; and (vi) potential and challenges for increased castor production.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2011.0210

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 82 references

Cited by

See all 311

Metadata

Authors
Severino, L. S., Auld, D. L., Baldanzi, M., Cândido, M. J. D., Chen, G., Crosby, W., Tan, D., He, X., Lakshmamma, P., Lavanya, C., Machado, O. L. T., Mielke, T., Milani, M., Miller, T. D., Morris, J. B., Morse, S. A., Navas, A. A., Soares, D. J., Sofiatti, V., Wang, M. L., Zanotto, M. D., & Zieler, H.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07
Volume
104
Issue
4
Pages
853-880
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2048809272
Cited by
311
References
82
FWCI
21.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Review on the Challenges for Increased Production of Castor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2011.0210
The paper
Severino, L. S., Auld, D. L., Baldanzi, M., Cândido, M. J. D., Chen, G., Crosby, W., Tan, D., He, X., Lakshmamma, P., Lavanya, C., Machado, O. L. T., Mielke, T., Milani, M., Miller, T. D., Morris, J. B., Morse, S. A., Navas, A. A., Soares, D. J., Sofiatti, V., . . . Zieler, H. (2012). A Review on the Challenges for Increased Production of Castor. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0210

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.