Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Corn Response to Nitrogen is Influenced by Soil Texture and Weather

Open access
Tremblay, Nicolas, Bouroubi, Yacine M., Bélec, Carl, Mullen, Robert William, Kitchen, Newell R., Thomason, Wade E., Ebelhar, Steve, Mengel, David B., Raun, William R., Francis, Dennis D., Vories, Earl D., Ortiz‐Monasterio, Ivan·2012·Agronomy Journal

Abstract

Soil properties and weather conditions are known to affect soil N availability and plant N uptake; however, studies examining N response as affected by soil and weather sometimes give conflicting results. Meta‐analysis is a statistical method for estimating treatment effects in a series of experiments to explain the sources of heterogeneity. In this study, the technique was used to examine the influence of soil and weather parameters on N response of corn (Zea mays L.) across 51 studies involving the same N rate treatments that were performed in a diversity of North American locations between 2006 and 2009. Results showed that corn response to added N was significantly greater in fine‐textured soils than in medium‐textured soils. Abundant and well‐distributed rainfall and, to a lesser extent, accumulated corn heat units enhanced N response. Corn yields increased by a factor of 1.6 (over the unfertilized control) in medium‐textured soils and 2.7 in fine‐textured soils at high N rates. Subgroup analyses were performed on the fine‐textured soil class based on weather parameters. Rainfall patterns had an important effect on N response in this soil texture class, with yields being increased 4.5‐fold by in‐season N fertilization under conditions of “abundant and well‐distributed rainfall.” These findings could be useful for developing N fertilization algorithms that would prescribe N application at optimal rates taking into account rainfall pattern and soil texture, which would lead to improved crop profitability and reduced environmental impacts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2012.0184

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Tremblay, N., Bouroubi, Y. M., Bélec, C., Mullen, R. W., Kitchen, N. R., Thomason, W. E., Ebelhar, S., Mengel, D. B., Raun, W. R., Francis, D. D., Vories, E. D., & Ortiz‐Monasterio, I.
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11
Volume
104
Issue
6
Pages
1658-1671
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2011937373
Cited by
256
References
2
FWCI
14.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corn Response to Nitrogen is Influenced by Soil Texture and Weather. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/agronj2012.0184
The paper
Tremblay, N., Bouroubi, Y. M., Bélec, C., Mullen, R. W., Kitchen, N. R., Thomason, W. E., Ebelhar, S., Mengel, D. B., Raun, W. R., Francis, D. D., Vories, E. D., & Ortiz‐Monasterio, I. (2012). Corn Response to Nitrogen is Influenced by Soil Texture and Weather. Agronomy Journal. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2012.0184

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.