Cited by 22Irrigation Practices and Water ManagementWater resources management and optimizationClimate change impacts on agriculture

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optimal Field Partitioning for Center‐Pivot‐Irrigated Cotton in the Texas High Plains

Abstract

This study was conducted to test the hypothesis that the yield or profit from a cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) field can be increased by irrigating only a fraction of the field while keeping the rest as dryland when the irrigation water availability is suboptimal. The cotton growth simulation model Cotton2K was used to simulate the lint yield of cotton for different amounts of available irrigation water using historic weather data for the last 110 yr in the Texas High Plains. The data generated were used to evaluate different field partitioning strategies at four different amounts of total available irrigation water (150, 225, 300, and 375 mm). The results revealed that irrigating 30, 45, 55, and 70% of the field were the best strategies to maximize both the lint yield and profit under 150, 225, 300, and 375 mm of available irrigation water, respectively. The field partitioning strategies had a more pronounced impact on effective lint yield and profit when lower amounts of irrigation water were available and under low-rainfall conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/agronj2012.0219

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Almas L.K. W.A.Colette andN.C.Adusumilli.2008.Economic value of ground water resources and irrigated agriculture in the Oklahoma Panhandle. Paper presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting Dallas TX. 2–6 Feb. 2008. · DOI
  2. Baumhardt R.L., 2007, Abstracts, Annual Meetings of the ASA–CSSA–SSSA, New Orleans, LA. 4–8 Nov. 2007 [CD‐ROM]
  3. Boggess W.G., 1983, Risk‐return assessment of irrigation decisions in humid regions, South. J. Agric. Econ., 15, 135
  4. Boone K., 1997, Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, New Orleans. 6–12 Jan. 1997, 380
  5. Clouse R.W., 2004, Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, TX. 5–9 Jan. 2004, 874
  6. 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.08.009 · DOI
  7. Doorenbos J., 1979, Irrig. Drain. Pap. 33
  8. Easterling D.R. T.R.Karl J.H.Lawrimore andDel GrecoS.A..1999.United States historical climatology network daily temperature precipitation and snow data for 1871–1997. ORNL/CDIAC‐118 NDP‐070. Carbon Dioxide Inf. Anal. Ctr. Oak Ridge Natl. Lab. Oak Ridge TN. · DOI
  9. 10.2135/cropsci1982.0011183X002200010031x · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10584-007-9304-x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hillel D., 1998, Environmental soil physics
  12. Hons F.M., 2011, L‐5458. Texas Coop. Ext. Serv
  13. 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.05.003 · DOI
  14. 10.2134/agronj2000.925821x · DOI
  15. Marani A., 2000, Cotton2k model version 4.0
  16. Marani A., 1992, Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Nashville, TN. 6–10 Jan. 1992, 1352
  17. Marani A., 1992, Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Nashville, TN. 6–10 Jan. 1992, 1358
  18. Marani A., 1992, Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Nashville, TN. 6–10 Jan. 1992, 1361
  19. 10.1175/2009JAMC2018.1 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0308-521X(89)90012-7 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Mitchell D.M., 2007, Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, New Orleans, LA. 9–12 Jan. 2007, 797
  22. National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2010, Statistics by state
  23. 10.2134/agronj2004.3770 · DOI
  24. 10.2134/agronj1992.00021962008400040002x · DOI
  25. Richardson C.W., 1984, USDA‐ARS Rep. 8
  26. Ritchie J.W., 2004, Risk management strategies using seasonal climate forecasting in irrigated cotton production: A tale of stochastic dominance, Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ., 48, 65, 10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00236.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. Texas AgriLife Extension Service, 2011, Estimated costs and returns per acre: Cotton, dryland—conventional seed
  28. Texas AgriLife Extension Service, 2011, Estimated costs and returns per acre: Cotton, pivot irrigated—herbicide‐tolerant—insect‐resistant
  29. 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800040011x · DOI
  31. Wanjura D.F., 1990, Evaluating decision criteria for irrigation scheduling of cotton, Trans. ASAE, 33, 512, 10.13031/2013.31359 · DOI
  32. 10.13031/2013.28582 · DOI
  33. 10.13031/2013.27846 · DOI
  34. Wanjura D.F., 2000, Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, TX. 4–8 Jan. 2000, 442
  35. Wilde C., 2008, Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Nashville, TN. 8–11 Jan. 2008, 485
  36. 10.1016/j.fcr.2007.10.019 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.06.002 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nair, S., Maas, S., Wang, C., & Mauget, S.
Affiliations
  • Texas Tech University (US)
  • Agricultural Research Service (US)
Corresponding author
Nair, Shyam
Venue
Agronomy Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01
Volume
105
Issue
1
Pages
124-133
ISSN
  • 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-0645
OpenAlex
W2002710049
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
Funders
USDA-ARS
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water resources management and optimization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
Keywords
center pivot irrigation, cotton, Gossypium hirsutum, irrigation water allocation, rainfed agriculture, lint yield, farm profitability, irrigation water scarcity, Texas High Plains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review