Cellulosic biofuel potential of a winter Rye double crop across the U.S. corn–soybean belt
Abstract
Interest in renewable energy sources derived from plant biomass is increasing, raising concerns about fuel vs. food competition. One strategy to produce additional cellulosic biomass without reducing food‐harvest potential is to grow winter cover crops after harvest of the primary summer crop. This study estimated biomass accumulation of a fall‐planted winter rye (Secale cereale L.) double crop across the United States on corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] croplands. We identified corn and soybean areas by county using National Agricultural Statistics Service data, excluding irrigated land and areas already supporting a winter small‐grain crop. Within this area, we calculated biomass production after corn harvest and before the subsequent corn or soybean crop for 30 locations using RyeGro, a cover‐crop simulation model. Average RyeGro biomass yields for a 14‐yr period were used to develop a regression model based on temperature and precipitation, which was used to determine rye biomass potential in each county. The spatial analysis indicated that 7.44 Mha in continuous corn and 31.7 Mha in a corn–soybean rotation are suitable for producing winter rye. The average RyeGro biomass yield for the 30 locations for six planting–harvest date scenarios is 4.2 Mg ha−1. The regression modeling results projected that 112 to 151 Tg (120–170 million U.S. tons) of rye biomass can be harvested from this land base 14 to 7 d, respectively, before spring crop planting. The study demonstrates the sizable potential for this strategy to produce cellulosic biofuel feedstock without redirecting the primary food crop to fuel.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
It is viable in many regions to intensify cropping by expanding current multiple cropping areas, growing biofuel crops during fallow season, or bringing back previous abandoned multiple cropping.
“It is viable in many regions to intensify cropping by expanding current multiple cropping areas [56,106], growing biofuel crops during fallow season [107,108] or bringing back previous abandoned multiple cropping (which was converted to lower intensity because of high farming cost or other reasons) [56,109].”
From Biomass and biofuels in China: Toward bioenergy resource potentials and their impacts on the environment (2018) · cites this paper as [108]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 54 · Cited by 58
- Authors
- Feyereisen, G. W., Camargo, G. G. T., Baxter, R. E., Baker, J. M., & Richard, T. L.
- Affiliations
- Agricultural Research Service (US)
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Feyereisen, Gary W.
- Venue
- Agronomy Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-05
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 631-642
- ISSN
- 0002-1962 (ISSN-L)
- 1435-0645
- OpenAlex
- W2019864907
- Cited by
- 58
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 12.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agronomy Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Keywords
- winter rye, double cropping, cellulosic biofuels, cover crops, corn-soybean rotation, biomass yield
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review