Industrial hemp response to nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization
Open accessAbstract
Industrial hemp ( Cannabis sativa L.) production has increased in Canada in recent years, and interest for this multipurpose crop remains high. The lack of agronomic guidelines for Eastern Canada represents, however, a limiting factor for local hemp production. This study assessed biomass and seed yields and composition of two hemp cultivars (CRS‐1 and Anka), following various N, P, and K fertilization treatments (0, 50, 100, 150, and 200 kg N or K ha −1 ; 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100 kg P ha −1 ). The experiment was conducted in multiple environments in the province of Québec. Positive linear and quadratic responses of biomass yield, seed yield, and seed crude protein concentration to N fertilization were observed in all environments; the magnitude of the response depended, however, on the environment and cultivar. Across environments and cultivars, biomass and seed yields increased from 1674 to 4209 kg ha −1 and from 519 to 1340 kg ha −1 , respectively, with the application of 200 kg N ha −1 when compared with the unfertilized control. Nitrogen fertilization affected biomass cellulose and hemicellulose concentrations, but the overall response remained minimal. Phosphorus and potassium fertilizations had very limited effect on biomass and seed yields and composition in all environments. In conclusion, while industrial hemp responded to N fertilization up to 200 kg N ha −1 , response to P and K fertilization remained limited.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hemp comprises less than 1% of the total natural fiber used in the US due to the lack of processing infrastructure and agronomic guidelines as it competes against wood and related agro fibers.
“Even with this huge range of applications, hemp comprises <1% of the total natural fiber used in the US due to the lack of processing infrastructure and agronomic guidelines as it competes against wood and related agro fibers (Aubin et al. 2015; Wenger et al. 2018).”
From A critical review of industrial fiber hemp anatomy, agronomic practices, and valorization into sustainable bioproducts (2025) · cites this paper as Aubin et al. 2015
The Conclusions say that limited hemp production in Eastern Canada is partly due to a lack of agronomic guidance, and the introduction says recommendations could also serve parts of the northeastern United States. The paper does not establish that hemp accounts for less than 1% of US natural fiber use or attribute that share to processing infrastructure or competition with other fibers. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Agronomy of fibre hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) in Europe.
Struik, P. C., Amaducci, S., Bullard, M. J., Stutterheim, N. C., Venturi, G., & Cromack, H. T. H. (2000) · Industrial Crops and Products · doi:10.1016/s0926-6690(99)00048-5 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Chen, T., J. He, J. Zhang, H. Zhang, P. Qian, J. Hao, and L. Li. 2010. Analytical characterization of hempseed (seed of Cannabis sativa L.) oil from eight regions in China. J. Diet. Suppl. 7:117-129. doi:10.3109/19390211003781669 · DOI
- Finnan, J., and B. Burke. 2013. Potassium fertilization of hemp (Cannabis sativa). Ind. Crops Prod. 41:419-422. doi:10.1016/j.ind- crop.2012.04.055 · DOI
- Gomez, K.A., and A.A. Gomez. 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research. 2nd ed. Wiley & Sons, New York.
- House, J.D., J. Neufeld, and G. Leson. 2010. Evaluating the quality of pro- tein from hemp seed (Cannabis sativa L.) products through the use of the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score method. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58:11801-11807. doi:10.1021/jf102636b · DOI
- Iványi, I., and Z. Izsáki. 2009. Effect of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potas- sium fertilization on nutrional status of fiber hemp. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 40:974-986. doi:10.1080/00103620802693466 · DOI
- Izsáki, Z., and I. Iványi. 2004. Effect of nutrient supply on the quality of lin- seed and hempseed. J. Nat. Fibers 1:59-75. doi:10.1300/J395v01n04_04 · DOI
- Mihoc, M., G. Pop, A. Militaru, and D.V. Mircov. 2013. Protein and oil con- tent in some hempseed (Canabis sativa L.) varieties and antioxidant activity of hempseed oil. In: Actual tasks on agricultural engineering. Proceedings of the 41st International Symposium on Agricultural Engineering, Opatija, Croatia. 19-22 Feb. 2013. p. 374-382.
- Stanford, F.B. 1998. Industrial hemp in Alberta. In: Alberta Hemp Symposia Proceedings, Red Deer, AB, Canada. 10 Mar. 1998. Alberta Agric., Food and Rural Dev., Publ. Office, Edmonton, Canada. p.
- Vera, C.L., S.S. Malhi, S.M. Phelps, W.E. May, and E.A. Johnson. 2010. N, P and S fertilization on industrial hemp in Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 90:179-184. doi:10.4141/CJPS09101 · DOI
- Vera, C.L., S.S. Malhi, J.P. Raney, and Z.H. Wang. 2004. The effect of N and P fertilization on growth, seed yield and quality of industrial hemp in the Parkland region of Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 84:939-947. doi:10.4141/P04-022 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Adesina, I., Bhowmik, A., Sharma, H., & Shahbazi, A. (2020) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture10040129 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Hemp (Cannabis sativa L.) Flour-Based Wheat Bread as Fortified Bakery Product
Rusu, I. E., Marc (Vlaic), R. A., Mureşan, C. C., Mureşan, A. E., Mureşan, V., Pop, C. R., Chiş, M. S., Man, S. M., Filip, M. R., Onica, B.-M., et al. (2021) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants10081558 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Basak, M., Broadway, M., Lewis, J., Starkey, H., Bloomquist, M., Peszlen, I., Davis, J., Lucia, L. A., & Pal, L. (2025) · BioResources · doi:10.15376/biores.20.2.basak · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“There are mixed conclusions about the effects of potassium and phosphorus (Aubin et al. 2015; Cherrett et al. 2005).”
InfluentialAhmadi, F., Kallinger, D., Starzinger, A., & Lackner, M. (2024) · Nitrogen · doi:10.3390/nitrogen5030042 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Aubin, M., Seguin, P., Vanasse, A., Tremblay, G. F., Mustafa, A. F., & Charron, J.
- Affiliations
- Collège MacDonald (CA)
- Dep. of Plant Science Macdonald Campus of McGill Univ. Sainte‐Anne‐de‐Bellevue QC H9X 3V9 Canada
- Université Laval (CA)
- Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (CA)
- Venue
- Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2015-11-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 2374-3832 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2298235574
- Cited by
- 116
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Crop Forage & Turfgrass Management (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Ministère de l’Agriculture, des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Plant Growth and Agriculture Techniques
- Keywords
- industrial hemp, Cannabis sativa, nitrogen fertilization, phosphorus fertilization, potassium fertilization, biomass yield, seed yield, cellulose and hemicellulose, cultivar response, environmental effects, Quebec
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review