The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Pesticide Content of Surface Water Draining from Agricultural Fields—A Review
Abstract
The literature on pesticide losses in runoff waters from agricultural fields is reviewed. For the majority of commercial pesticides, total losses are 0.5% or less of the amounts applied, unless severe rainfall conditions occur within 1–2 weeks after application. Exceptions are the organochlorine insecticides, which may lose about 1% regardless of weather pattern because of their long persistence; and soil surface‐applied, wettable‐powder formulations of herbicides, which may lose up to 5%, depending on weather and slope, because of the ease of washoff of the powder. Pesticides with solubilities of 10 ppm or higher are lost mainly in the water phase of runoff, and erosion control practices will have little effect on such losses. Organochlorine pesticides, paraquat, and arsenical pesticides, however, are important cases of pesticides which are strongly adsorbed by sediments, and erosion control can be important in controlling losses of these compounds. The behavior and fate of pesticides in streams receiving runoff is generally not known. Information on such factors as time and distance of impact of a given runoff event, ability of local ecosystems to recover from transient pesticide concentrations, and dissipation or concentration processes in aquatic ecosystems will have to be obtained before “edge‐of‐field” pesticide losses can be related to water quality in receiving waters.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The environmental consequences of adopting conservation tillage in Europe: reviewing the evidence
Holland, J. M. (2004) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2003.12.018 · Cited by 1,062
Reichenberger, S., Bach, M., Skitschak, A., & Frede, H.-G. (2007) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.04.046 · Cited by 699
Konstantinou, I. K., Hela, D. G., & Albanis, T. A. (2006) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.07.024 · Cited by 522
Transfer of glyphosate and its degradate AMPA to surface waters through urban sewerage systems
Botta, F., Lavison, G., Couturier, G., Alliot, F., Moreau-Guigon, E., Fauchon, N., Guery, B., Chevreuil, M., & Blanchoud, H. (2009) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.05.008 · Cited by 205
Rasmussen, J. J., Wiberg-Larsen, P., Baattrup-Pedersen, A., Cedergreen, N., McKnight, U. S., Kreuger, J., Jacobsen, D., Kristensen, E. A., & Friberg, N. (2015) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2015.07.021 · Cited by 195
Metadata
- Authors
- Wauchope, R. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1978-10
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 459-472
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2057004769
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pesticide Content of Surface Water Draining from Agricultural Fields—A Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq1978.00472425000700040001x
- The paper
- Wauchope, R. D. (1978). The Pesticide Content of Surface Water Draining from Agricultural Fields—A Review. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1978.00472425000700040001x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.