The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Analysis of Effects of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Ozone on Cotton Yield Trends
Abstract
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields have declined since 1964 despite improvements in technology and introductions of higher‐yielding cultivars. Cotton scientists have been unable to identify exact causes of the yield decline. For the past 25 yr, global atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]) has been increasing due to the increased burning of fossil fuels; cotton has been found to be sensitive to [CO2]. Cotton has also been found to be sensitive to atmospheric ozone concentration ([O3]) at levels that occur regularly where it is grown. To analyze the effects of [CO2] and [O3] on cotton‐yield trends, simulations were made using the cotton crop model GOSSYM. Input data for simulations were obtained from cotton breeders' trial sites located at Florence, SC; Stoneville, MS; College Station, TX; Phoenix, AZ; and Fresno, CA. The simulated effects of the [CO2] and [O3] on cotton yields changed from location to location due to interactions with soil, plant, and atmospheric variables and with nutrient levels in the soil. Given enough N, the increased [CO2] would probably result in a 10% increase in lint yield. Due to N stress sometime during the growing season, however, the plants could not fully utilize the increased [CO2]. Ozone concentration increased during the period of cotton‐yield decline, and this increase in [O3] was found to affect simulated cotton yields adversely. It appears that O3 is one of the contributing factors to the yield decline. Overall O3 had a more adverse effe…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thorp, K. R., Ale, S., Bange, M. P., Barnes, E. M., Hoogenboom, G., Lascano, R. J., McCarthy, A. C., Nair, S., Paz, J. O., Rajan, N., et al. (2014) · Journal of Cotton Science · doi:10.56454/oovc6073 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Reddy, V. R., Baker, D. N., & McKinion, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Clemson University (US)
- USDA‐ARS Crop Simulation Res. Unit Crop Science Res. Lab. P.O. Box 5367 Mississippi State MS 39762
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 427-432
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W1981233846
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to elevated CO2
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
- Keywords
- atmospheric CO2, ozone effects on crops, Gossypium hirsutum, crop yield simulation, nitrogen deficiency, soil nitrogen, lint yield, elevated CO2
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review