Cited by 21Plant responses to elevated CO2Climate change impacts on agricultureResearch in Cotton Cultivation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analysis of Effects of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Ozone on Cotton Yield Trends

Reddy, V. R., Baker, D. N., McKinion, J. M.·1989·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields have declined since 1964 despite improvements in technology and introductions of higher‐yielding cultivars. Cotton scientists have been unable to identify exact causes of the yield decline. For the past 25 yr, global atmospheric CO2 concentration ([CO2]) has been increasing due to the increased burning of fossil fuels; cotton has been found to be sensitive to [CO2]. Cotton has also been found to be sensitive to atmospheric ozone concentration ([O3]) at levels that occur regularly where it is grown. To analyze the effects of [CO2] and [O3] on cotton‐yield trends, simulations were made using the cotton crop model GOSSYM. Input data for simulations were obtained from cotton breeders' trial sites located at Florence, SC; Stoneville, MS; College Station, TX; Phoenix, AZ; and Fresno, CA. The simulated effects of the [CO2] and [O3] on cotton yields changed from location to location due to interactions with soil, plant, and atmospheric variables and with nutrient levels in the soil. Given enough N, the increased [CO2] would probably result in a 10% increase in lint yield. Due to N stress sometime during the growing season, however, the plants could not fully utilize the increased [CO2]. Ozone concentration increased during the period of cotton‐yield decline, and this increase in [O3] was found to affect simulated cotton yields adversely. It appears that O3 is one of the contributing factors to the yield decline. Overall O3 had a more adverse effe…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800040005x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 21

Metadata

Authors
Reddy, V. R., Baker, D. N., & McKinion, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Clemson University (US)
  • USDA‐ARS Crop Simulation Res. Unit Crop Science Res. Lab. P.O. Box 5367 Mississippi State MS 39762
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1989-10
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
427-432
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W1981233846
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Climate change impacts on agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
Keywords
atmospheric CO2, ozone effects on crops, Gossypium hirsutum, crop yield simulation, nitrogen deficiency, soil nitrogen, lint yield, elevated CO2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review