The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of Calcium/Aluminum Ratios as Indicators of Stress in Forest Ecosystems
Abstract
The calcium/aluminum (Ca/Al) molar ratio of the soil solution provides a valuable measurement endpoint or ecological indicator for identification of approximate thresholds beyond which the risk of forest damage from Al stress and nutrient imbalances increases. The Ca/Al ratio can also be used as an indicator to assess forest ecosystem changes over time in response to acidic deposition, forest harvesting, or other processes contributing to acid soil infertility. Based on a critical review of literature on Al stress, we estimate that there is a 50:50 risk of adverse impacts on tree growth or nutrition when the soil solution Ca/Al ratio is as low as 1.0, a 75% risk when the soil solution ratio is as low as 0.5, and nearly a 100% risk when the soil solution Ca/Al molar ratio is as low as 0.2. The Ca/Al ratio of the soil solution can be corroborated with other complementary indices. Our analysis found that threshold conditions for potential forest impacts from Al stress are indicated by four successive measurement endpoints: (i) soil base saturation less than 15% of effective CEC; (ii) soil solution Ca/Al molar ratio ≤1.0 (for 50% risk); (iii) fine root tissue Ca/Al molar ratio ≤0.2 (for 50% risk); and (iv) a foliar tissue Ca/Al molar ratio ≤12.5 (for 50% risk). With appropriate precautions and caveats, these sequential indices based on the Ca/Al ratio provide a means of distinguishing site conditions where Al stress is likely to affect tree growth adversely.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Long-Term Effects of Acid Rain: Response and Recovery of a Forest Ecosystem
Likens, G. E., Driscoll, C. T., & Buso, D. C. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.272.5259.244 · Cited by 1,227
DRISCOLL, C. T., LAWRENCE, G. B., BULGER, A. J., BUTLER, T. J., CRONAN, C. S., EAGAR, C., LAMBERT, K. F., LIKENS, G. E., STODDARD, J. L., & WEATHERS, K. C. (2001) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0180:aditnu]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,105
Self-citationCO 2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database
LUYSSAERT, S., INGLIMA, I., JUNG, M., RICHARDSON, A. D., REICHSTEIN, M., PAPALE, D., PIAO, S. L., SCHULZE, E. ‐., WINGATE, L., MATTEUCCI, G., et al. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01439.x · Cited by 1,010
Schoenholtz, S. H., Miegroet, H. V., & Burger, J. A. (2000) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00423-0 · Cited by 826
Fenn, M. E., Poth, M. A., Aber, J. D., Baron, J. S., Bormann, B. T., Johnson, D. W., Lemly, A. D., McNulty, S. G., Ryan, D. F., & Stottlemyer, R. (1998) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/1051-0761(1998)008[0706:neinae]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- Cronan, C. S., & Grigal, D. F.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-03
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 209-226
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2043646318
- Cited by
- 771
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Calcium/Aluminum Ratios as Indicators of Stress in Forest Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq1995.00472425002400020002x
- The paper
- Cronan, C. S., & Grigal, D. F. (1995). Use of Calcium/Aluminum Ratios as Indicators of Stress in Forest Ecosystems. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1995.00472425002400020002x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.