Cited by 262Heavy metals in environmentPlant Micronutrient Interactions and EffectsChromium effects and bioremediation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Kinetics of Cadmium Release from Soils as Influenced by Organic Acids: Implication in Cadmium Availability

Krishnamurti, G. S. R., Cieslinski, G., Huang, P. M., Van Rees, K. C. J.·1997·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

The low‐molecular‐weight organic acids (LMWOAs) secreted by plant roots modify the mobility of Cd through formation of soluble complexes in the soil rhizosphere; the kinetics of Cd release as influenced by organic acids and its impact on Cd bioaccumulation remains to be established. The influence of LMWOAs (10−3 and 10−2 M), viz., acetic, citric, oxalic, fumaric, and succinic acids, which are present in the soil rhizosphere, on the kinetics of Cd release from selected soils (Luseland, Waitville, and Jedbergh) of Saskatchewan, Canada, was investigated at 25°C and at an ionic strength of 0.1 M NaNO 3. It was observed that the Cd release from the soils increased initially up to a reaction period of about 2 h and then slowly decreased with time. With time, the LMWOAs were apparently microbially degraded and the soil solution Cd 2+, which was transformed from the Cd‐LMWOA complexes by microbial degradation, was adsorbed onto the negatively charged soil particles. Increasing amounts of Cd were released from the soils to the soil solution with the renewal of LMWOAs after every 2 h. The short‐term (reaction period of 0.25 to 1 h) kinetics of Cd release from the soils was described by a parabolic diffusion kinetic model. The overall diffusion coefficient of the Cd release from the soil and the Cd released by the renewal of LMWOAs followed the same trend as the Cd availability index of the soils: Luseland >> Waitville > Jedbergh. Thus, the results presented in this investigation indicate the importance of the kinetics of the Cd release from the soils by the LMWOAs excreted by root exudates in understanding the availability of soil Cd.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600010038x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Krishnamurti, G. S. R., Cieslinski, G., Huang, P. M., & Van Rees, K. C. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Saskatchewan (CA)
  • Dep. of Soil Science Univ. of Saskatchewan 51, Campus Drive Saskatoon SK Canada S7N 5A8
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-01
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
271-277
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W2043823940
Cited by
262
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 16
FWCI
8.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Heavy metals in environment
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Micronutrient Interactions and Effects
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Chromium effects and bioremediation
Keywords
cadmium, low molecular weight organic acids, root exudates, rhizosphere, cadmium bioavailability, cadmium bioaccumulation, parabolic diffusion model, diffusion coefficient, acetic acid, citric acid, oxalic acid, fumaric acid, succinic acid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review