Cited by 18Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nitrite and the Two Stages of Nitrification in Nitrogen Polluted Onondaga Lake, New York

Gelda, Rakesh K., Effler, Steven W., Brooks, Carol M.·1999·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Nitrite (NO−2) concentrations in the upper waters of N polluted Onondaga Lake, New York, are documented for the April through October interval for a 10‐yr (1989–1998) period. Inputs of NO−2 from a domestic waste treatment facility (METRO) and tributaries (4) to the lake are quantified for four of the years (1991–1994). The NO−2 concentrations measured in Onondaga Lake (e.g., annual maxima in the range 200–1000 mg N m 3) are some of the highest reported for lakes and rivers in the literature. These levels represent severe violations of toxicity standards. Annual average concentrations in the METRO effluent ranged from 412 to 1097 mg N m−3. The METRO load represented >90% of the total external NO−2 load to the lake. A mechanistic mass balance model for NO−2 and NO−3 is developed and applied for the lake to identify occurrences, and quantify the rates, of the first and second stages of nitrification. Nitrite is found to behave in a nearly conservative manner in the upper waters of the lake over the April to July interval. The progressive increases in concentrations over this interval have been largely in response to inputs from METRO. Major deviations from conservative behavior occurred for NO−2 in most years over the July to October interval as a result of the irregular operation of the two stages of the nitrification process. This has been manifested as large and abrupt changes in NO−2 concentration in the July to October interval. Potential factors responsible for the observe…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq1999.00472425002800050016x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gelda, R. K., Effler, S. W., & Brooks, C. M.
Affiliations
Upstate Freshwater Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Effler, Steven W.
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-09
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
1505-1517
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W2032433403
Cited by
18
References
0
Citations by year
2012: 1
FWCI
2.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Keywords
nitrite, nitrification, Onondaga Lake, nitrogen pollution, domestic effluents, nitrate, mass balance model, conservative behavior, lake water quality, nutrient loading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review