The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nitrite and the Two Stages of Nitrification in Nitrogen Polluted Onondaga Lake, New York
Abstract
Nitrite (NO−2) concentrations in the upper waters of N polluted Onondaga Lake, New York, are documented for the April through October interval for a 10‐yr (1989–1998) period. Inputs of NO−2 from a domestic waste treatment facility (METRO) and tributaries (4) to the lake are quantified for four of the years (1991–1994). The NO−2 concentrations measured in Onondaga Lake (e.g., annual maxima in the range 200–1000 mg N m 3) are some of the highest reported for lakes and rivers in the literature. These levels represent severe violations of toxicity standards. Annual average concentrations in the METRO effluent ranged from 412 to 1097 mg N m−3. The METRO load represented >90% of the total external NO−2 load to the lake. A mechanistic mass balance model for NO−2 and NO−3 is developed and applied for the lake to identify occurrences, and quantify the rates, of the first and second stages of nitrification. Nitrite is found to behave in a nearly conservative manner in the upper waters of the lake over the April to July interval. The progressive increases in concentrations over this interval have been largely in response to inputs from METRO. Major deviations from conservative behavior occurred for NO−2 in most years over the July to October interval as a result of the irregular operation of the two stages of the nitrification process. This has been manifested as large and abrupt changes in NO−2 concentration in the July to October interval. Potential factors responsible for the observe…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Metro inputs have caused profound water quality impacts in Onondaga Lake, as reflected in routine violations of receiving water quality standards for ammonia (Matthews et al. 2000), NO2 - (Gelda et al. 1999), DO (Matthews and Effler 2006b), and clarity (Perkins and Effler 1996).”
From Implications of redox processes for the rehabilitation of an urban lake, Onondaga Lake, New York (2008) · cites this paper as Gelda et al. 1999
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Matthews, D. A., Effler, S. W., Matthews, C. M. B., Siegfried, C. A., & Spada, M. E. (2001) · Water Environment Research · doi:10.2175/106143001x143439 · Cited by 40
Self-citationImplications of redox processes for the rehabilitation of an urban lake, Onondaga Lake, New York
Effler, S. W., & Matthews, D. A. (2008) · Lake and Reservoir Management · doi:10.1080/07438140809354056 · Cited by 26
Self-citationEffler, S. W., O'Donnell, S. M., Prestigiacomo, A. R., Matthews, D. A., & Auer, M. T. (2013) · Water Environment Research · doi:10.2175/106143012x13415215906690 · Cited by 13
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gelda, R. K., Effler, S. W., & Brooks, C. M.
- Affiliations
- Upstate Freshwater Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Effler, Steven W.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1505-1517
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2032433403
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
- Keywords
- nitrite, nitrification, Onondaga Lake, nitrogen pollution, domestic effluents, nitrate, mass balance model, conservative behavior, lake water quality, nutrient loading
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review