The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Denitrification Rates in a Wastewater‐Irrigated Forest Soil in New Zealand
Abstract
Denitrification is considered to be an important N removal process in land‐based wastewater treatment systems, although in situ denitrification rates have rarely been reported. We investigated the contribution of denitrification to N removal in a land treatment system by measuring in situ denitrification rates for 12 mo in a Monterey pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) forest irrigated with tertiary‐treated wastewater. The variability of denitrification rates was investigated using a nested field design that divided the land treatment system into four spatial components (irrigation block, topographic position, field site, and sample plot) and two temporal components (sample period, sample day). Denitrification was measured using undisturbed soil cores collected daily, for six consecutive days on 21 occasions throughout the year. Soil moisture content, NO 3 concentration, available C, denitrifying enzyme activity, and temperature also were measured. The annual denitrification rate in the irrigated soil was 2.4 kg N ha−1 yr−1, and only slightly higher than the unirrigated soil (1.7 kg N ha−1 yr−1). Temporal effects (i.e., seasonal and day‐to‐day variation) contributed more than spatial effects to the overall variation in denitrification rates. Multiple regression analysis showed that soil factors could only explain 29% of the variation in denitrification rates. Soil water‐filled porosity was low in the land treatment system, and less than the critical threshold value (74% water‐filled porosity) determined in a laboratory study. We concluded that denitrification in this land treatment system studied was limited by excessive aeration in the free‐draining soils.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Denitrification at this site was limited by low-moisture content of the soil because there should have been enough C present for denitrification to occur (Barton et al., 1999).”
From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Barton et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“Although denitrification rates have not been widely reported for other land-based systems, this case study illustrates upland denitrification rates do not contribute significant N removal if the upland soils are free-draining (Barton et al., 1999).”
From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Barton et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“The soils are free-draining and are not able to hold sufficient moisture to limit O 2 diffusion into the soil, which limited denitrification despite large amounts of N added to the soil (Barton et al., 1999;Tozer et al., 2005).”
From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Barton et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“However, soil denitrification accounted for less than 1% of total wastewater N applied annually (Barton et al., 1999).”
From Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall (2011) · cites this paper as Barton et al., 1999
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Long-term nitrate removal in a denitrification wall
Long, L. M., Schipper, L. A., & Bruesewitz, D. A. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.02.005 · Cited by 66
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barton, L., McLay, C. D. A., Schipper, L. A., & Smith, C. T.
- Affiliations
- Scion (NZ)
- University of Waikato (NZ)
- Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Barton, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2008-2014
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2083589889
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
- Keywords
- denitrification, nitrogen removal, land treatment, wastewater irrigation, forest soils, Pinus radiata, tertiary treated wastewater, soil aeration, denitrification enzyme activity, seasonal variation, spatial variability, soil moisture, nitrate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review