The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ethylenediaminedissuccinate as a New Chelate for Environmentally Safe Enhanced Lead Phytoextraction
Abstract
Using a soil column experiment, we compared the effect of a single dose and weekly additions of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and ethylenediaminedissuccinate (EDDS) on the uptake of Pb, Zn, and Cd by Chinese cabbage [Brassica rapa L. subsp. pekinensis (Lour.) Hanelt], and on the leaching of heavy metals through the soil profile. The analysis of plant material revealed that both chelates increased the concentrations of Pb and, to a lesser extent, also of Zn and Cd in the leaves of the test plant. The most effective applications were single doses of 10 mmol EDTA and EDDS kg(-1) soil, which caused the concentrations of Pb in the shoots to increase 94.2- and 102.3-fold, respectively, relative to the control. The same dose of EDTA increased the concentration of Zn and Cd in the leaves 4.3- and 3.8-fold and of EDDS 4.7- and 3.5-fold, respectively. In treatments with weekly additions and lower concentrations of both chelates, EDTA was more effective than EDDS in increasing the plant uptake of Pb. In soil columns treated with weekly additions of 10 mmol kg(-1) EDTA, on average 22.7, 7.0, and 39.8% of initial total Pb, Zn, and Cd in the soil were leached through the soil profile. The same amount of EDDS caused much lower leaching of Pb and Cd--only 0.8 and 1.5% of initial total concentrations. Leaching of Zn, 6.2% of the total concentration, was comparable with the EDTA treatment. A biotest with red clover (Trifolium pratense L.) indicated a greater phytotoxic effect of EDTA than EDDS addition. EDDS was also less toxic to soil fungi, as determined by phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) analysis, and caused less stress to soil microorganisms, as indicated by the trans to cis PLFA ratio. Chelate addition did not prevent the development of arbuscular mycorrhiza on red clover.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lead phytoextraction: species variation in lead uptake and translocation
HUANG, J. W., & CUNNINGHAM, S. D. (1996) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01147.x · Cited by 622
Cited by
Evangelou, M. W. H., Ebel, M., & Schaeffer, A. (2007) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.01.062 · Cited by 632
Marques, A. P. G. C., Rangel, A. O. S. S., & Castro, P. M. L. (2009) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380701798272 · Cited by 608
Urban environmental geochemistry of trace metals
Wong, C. S. C., Li, X., & Thornton, I. (2006) · Environmental Pollution · doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2005.09.004 · Cited by 600
Field crops for phytoremediation of metal-contaminated land. A review
Vamerali, T., Bandiera, M., & Mosca, G. (2010) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-009-0268-0 · Cited by 592
Trace element behaviour at the root–soil interface: Implications in phytoremediation
Kidd, P., Barceló, J., Bernal, M. P., Navari-Izzo, F., Poschenrieder, C., Shilev, S., Clemente, R., & Monterroso, C. (2009) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.06.013 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Grčman, H., Vodnik, D., Velikonja‐Bolta, Š., & Leštan, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 500-500
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992917981
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethylenediaminedissuccinate as a New Chelate for Environmentally Safe Enhanced Lead Phytoextraction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2003.0500
- The paper
- Grčman, H., Vodnik, D., Velikonja‐Bolta, Š., & Leštan, D. (2003). Ethylenediaminedissuccinate as a New Chelate for Environmentally Safe Enhanced Lead Phytoextraction. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.0500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.