The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Green Roof Stormwater Retention: Effects of Roof Surface, Slope, and Media Depth
Abstract
Urban areas generate considerably more stormwater runoff than natural areas of the same size due to a greater percentage of impervious surfaces that impede water infiltration. Roof surfaces account for a large portion of this impervious cover. Establishing vegetation on rooftops, known as green roofs, is one method of recovering lost green space that can aid in mitigating stormwater runoff. Two studies were performed using several roof platforms to quantify the effects of various treatments on stormwater retention. The first study used three different roof surface treatments to quantify differences in stormwater retention of a standard commercial roof with gravel ballast, an extensive green roof system without vegetation, and a typical extensive green roof with vegetation. Overall, mean percent rainfall retention ranged from 48.7% (gravel) to 82.8% (vegetated). The second study tested the influence of roof slope (2 and 6.5%) and green roof media depth (2.5, 4.0, and 6.0 cm) on stormwater retention. For all combined rain events, platforms at 2% slope with a 4‐cm media depth had the greatest mean retention, 87%, although the difference from the other treatments was minimal. The combination of reduced slope and deeper media clearly reduced the total quantity of runoff. For both studies, vegetated green roof systems not only reduced the amount of stormwater runoff, they also extended its duration over a period of time beyond the actual rain event.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quality of roof runoff for groundwater infiltration
Zobrist, J. (2000) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/s0043-1354(99)00290-0 · Cited by 132
Cited by
Green roof performance towards management of runoff water quantity and quality: A review
Czemiel Berndtsson, J. (2010) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.12.014 · Cited by 1,047
Rapid assessment of the cost-effectiveness of low impact development for CSO control
Montalto, F., Behr, C., Alfredo, K., Wolf, M., Arye, M., & Walsh, M. (2007) · Landscape and Urban Planning · doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.004 · Cited by 264
Pradhan, S., Al-Ghamdi, S. G., & Mackey, H. R. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.226 · Cited by 168
Alcazar, S. S., Olivieri, F., & Neila, J. (2016) · Urban Climate · doi:10.1016/j.uclim.2016.02.004 · Cited by 94
Werdin, J., Conn, R., Fletcher, T. D., Rayner, J. P., Williams, N. S. G., & Farrell, C. (2021) · Ecological Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106391 · Cited by 57
Metadata
- Authors
- VanWoert, N. D., Rowe, D. B., Andresen, J. A., Rugh, C. L., Fernandez, R. T., & Xiao, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1036-1044
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W1999608554
- Cited by
- 595
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.