The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Measuring Bioavailability: From a Scientific Approach to Standard Methods
Open accessAbstract
Biological effects are not related to the total concentration of a contaminant in the soil and soil‐like materials. Organisms respond only to the fraction that is biologically available. The bioavailable fractions of contaminants are dependent on soil properties and various processes varying with time and on the behavior or the target organism. Bioavailability may be assessed in two complementary ways: (i) by chemical methods (e.g., extraction methods), which determine a defined available fraction of a well defined class of contaminants; and (ii) by biological methods, which expose organisms to soil or soil eluates to monitor effects. Although there is scientific discussion on the concept of bioavailability, the literature gives enough evidence to recognize bioavailability as a promising tool in risk assessment. A large number of methods are available. Under regulatory aspects of soil protection, a risk assessment should be based on the same common concept of determination and assessment of exposure and measuring and assessment of effects. A harmonized framework on bioavailability is necessary to promote the development and introduction of workable (international) standard methods to be used in soil and site assessment. The working group ‘Bioavailability’ of ISO/TC190‐Soil Quality has developed a guidance document for development and selection of methods to assess bioavailability for different target species with regard to several classes of contaminants. The way to this standard, on the boarder of science and regulation, is described in this article.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bioavailability of heavy metals in soils: definitions and practical implementation—a critical review
Kim, R.-Y., Yoon, J.-K., Kim, T.-S., Yang, J. E., Owens, G., & Kim, K.-R. (2015) · Environmental Geochemistry and Health · doi:10.1007/s10653-015-9695-y · Cited by 541
The Bioavailability Processes as a Key to Evaluate Phytoremediation Efficiency
Petruzzelli, G., Pedron, F., Rosellini, I., & Barbafieri, M. (2015) · Phytoremediation · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10395-2_3 · Cited by 29
Iqbal, M., Bermond, A., & Lamy, I. (2013) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.11.032 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Harmsen, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-09
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1420-1428
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2123889390
- Cited by
- 302
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring Bioavailability: From a Scientific Approach to Standard Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2006.0492
- The paper
- Harmsen, J. (2007). Measuring Bioavailability: From a Scientific Approach to Standard Methods. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0492
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.