The DOI matches its Crossref record; 124 of the 124 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Myth of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration
Open accessAbstract
Intensive use of N fertilizers in modern agriculture is motivated by the economic value of high grain yields and is generally perceived to sequester soil organic C by increasing the input of crop residues. This perception is at odds with a century of soil organic C data reported herein for the Morrow Plots, the world's oldest experimental site under continuous corn (Zea mays L.). After 40 to 50 yr of synthetic fertilization that exceeded grain N removal by 60 to 190%, a net decline occurred in soil C despite increasingly massive residue C incorporation, the decline being more extensive for a corn–soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) or corn–oats (Avena sativa L.)–hay rotation than for continuous corn and of greater intensity for the profile (0–46 cm) than the surface soil. These findings implicate fertilizer N in promoting the decomposition of crop residues and soil organic matter and are consistent with data from numerous cropping experiments involving synthetic N fertilization in the USA Corn Belt and elsewhere, although not with the interpretation usually provided. There are important implications for soil C sequestration because the yield‐based input of fertilizer N has commonly exceeded grain N removal for corn production on fertile soils since the 1960s. To mitigate the ongoing consequences of soil deterioration, atmospheric CO 2 enrichment, and NO 3− pollution of ground and surface waters, N fertilization should be managed by site‐specific assessment of soil N availability. Current fertilizer N management practices, if combined with corn stover removal for bioenergy production, exacerbate soil C loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The United States Department of Agriculture
True, A. C. (1912) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/000271621204000113 · Cited by 5,113
A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance
HOCHBERG, Y. (1988) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/75.4.800 · Cited by 4,829
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602
Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration Rates by Tillage and Crop Rotation: A Global Data Analysis
West, T. O., & Post, W. M. (2002) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930 · Cited by 2,215 · cited 1×
“5 Mg C ha 1 yr 1 after conversion of conventional tillage to no-till (e.g., Lal et al., 1999; West and Post, 2002).”
Soil Fertility and Fertilizers: An Introduction to Nutrient Management
Tisdale, S. L. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,204
Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know?
Baker, J. M., Ochsner, T. E., Venterea, R. T., & Griffis, T. J. (2007) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.014 · Cited by 1,252
THE EFFECT OF ADDED NITROGEN ON THE RATE OF DECOMPOSITION OF ORGANIC MATTER
FOG, K. (1988) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1988.tb00725.x · Cited by 1,179
The Potential of U.S. Cropland to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect
Kimble, J. M., Lal, R., & Follett, R. F. (1998) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,064
Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization
Mack, M. C., Schuur, E. A. G., Bret-Harte, M. S., Shaver, G. R., & Chapin, F. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02887 · Cited by 1,030
Cited by
Review of greenhouse gas emissions from crop production systems and fertilizer management effects
Snyder, C. S., Bruulsema, T. W., Jensen, T. L., & Fixen, P. E. (2009) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2009.04.021 · Cited by 1,531
Johnston, A. E., Poulton, P. R., & Coleman, K. (2009) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(08)00801-8 · Cited by 568
Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111211 · Cited by 408
Kuppusamy, S., Thavamani, P., Megharaj, M., Venkateswarlu, K., & Naidu, R. (2016) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.018 · Cited by 383
Biochar production and applications in agro and forestry systems: a review
Wang, D., Jiang, P., Zhang, H., & Yuan, W. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137775 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, S. A., Mulvaney, R. L., Ellsworth, T. R., & Boast, C. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Environmental Quality
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1821-1832
- ISSN
- 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-2537
- OpenAlex
- W2054897709
- Cited by
- 746
- References
- 124
- FWCI
- 59.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Myth of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2134/jeq2007.0099
- The paper
- Khan, S. A., Mulvaney, R. L., Ellsworth, T. R., & Boast, C. W. (2007). The Myth of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration. Journal of Environmental Quality. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2007.0099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.