Cited by 93Soil and Water Nutrient DynamicsSoil erosion and sediment transportSoil Management and Crop Yield

Meta‐Analysis of Phosphorus Loss from No‐Till Soils

Daryanto, Stefani, Wang, Lixin, Jacinthe, Pierre André·2017·Journal of Environmental Quality

Abstract

Agriculture is a significant contributor to phosphorus (P) enrichment in aquatic ecosystems. No-till (NT) farming has been proposed as an alternative approach to conventional tillage (CT) in reducing soil P export, but published data have shown contrasting impacts, likely due to the interacting effects of different physical (climate region, rainfall variability, transport pathway, slope gradient) and management variables (NT duration, crop species). We conducted a meta-analysis to understand the extent to which each of these variables controls the concentration and load of different P fractions (dissolved P, particulate P) in agricultural runoff and leaching. In comparison with CT, particulate P loss was significantly lower with NT adoption (45 and 55% reduction in concentration and load, respectively), but an increase in dissolved P loss was observed. The extent of the reduction or increase, however, varied with different physical and management variables. In comparison with CT, for example, NT was not effective in reducing particulate P concentration during wet years and particulate P load on steep slopes (4-9%). Total P concentration was also similar with CT at sites under prolonged NT duration (∼10 yr) and at NT fields planted with soybean [ (L.) Merr.]. Our results underscore the need to consider the covarying physical and management factors when assessing the potential of NT farming in controlling P loss in the environment. The limited impact of NT on dissolved P loss r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2134/jeq2017.03.0121

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finding that no-till had the greatest dissolved P loads and conventional tillage the lowest in the Southeastern USA Plains and Temperate Prairies is consistent with prevailing science.

    “For the Southeastern USA Plains and Temperate Prairies, no-till had the greatest dissolved P loads and conventional the lowest, which is consistent with prevailing science (e.g., Daryanto et al. 2017).”

    From Nutrient Runoff From Agricultural Lands in North American Ecoregions (2025) · cites this paper as Daryanto et al. 2017

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daryanto, S., Wang, L., & Jacinthe, P. A.
Affiliations
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Corresponding author
Wang, Lixin
Venue
Journal of Environmental Quality
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-09
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1028-1037
ISSN
  • 0047-2425 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-2537
OpenAlex
W2744763916
Cited by
93
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
0.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Environmental Quality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
  • Author eBooks
Funders
Schlumberger Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil erosion and sediment transport
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Management and Crop Yield
Keywords
no-tillage, phosphorus loss, conventional tillage, particulate phosphorus, dissolved phosphorus, agricultural runoff, leaching, soybean, rainfall variability, slope gradient, water quality
MeSH terms
Crop Production, Environmental Monitoring, Phosphorus, Soil, Water Movements, Water Pollutants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review